Skip to main content

Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized?


In two studies undergraduate students were given an original paragraph and several rewritten versions of the paragraph, some of which were plagiarized (e.g., without a citation, superficially modified from the original) and some correctly paraphrased. Students were asked to determine whether each rewritten version had been plagiarized or correctly paraphrased. Approximately 74% of the students in both studies correctly identified the paraphrased versions. However, some of the plagiarized versions were misidentified as having been correctly paraphrased by as many as 40% to 50% of the students. Results suggest that students are often unclear as to what constitutes plagiarism and correct forms of paraphrasing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  • CAMPBELL, W. G., & BALLOU, S. V. (1974). Form and style: Theses, reports, term papers (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIS, S. F., GROVER, C. A., BECKER, A. H., & MCGREGOR, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 2–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DAVIS, S. F., SIMON, L, HANDLER, C., & MILLER, K. (1992). Academic dishonesty: One-time offenders or habitual criminals? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • FAKOURI, M. E. (1972). Achievement motivation and cheating. Psychological Reports, 31, 2–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAINES, V. J., DIEKHOFR G. M., LABEFF E. E., & CLARK, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immature, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25, 2–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HALE, J. L. (1987). Plagiarism in the classroom. Communication Research Reports, 4, 2–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • KARLIN, M., MICHAELS, C., & PODLOGAR, S. (1988). Research in Higher Education, 29, 2–36

    Google Scholar 

  • KIANG, N. (1993). Plagiarism in a multicultural academic setting. Paper presented at the ORI/AAAS Conference on Plagiarism and Theft of Ideas, Washington, DC.

  • MCCABE, D. L. (1992). The influence of situational ethics on cheating among college students. Sociological Inquiry, 62, 2–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCCABE, D. L., & TREVINO, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 2–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACCOBY, E. E., & JACKLIN, C. N. (1974). Psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOFFATT, M. (1990). Undergraduate cheating. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334921.

  • Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). (1994). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • ROIG, M., & BALLEW, C. (1994). Attitudes toward cheating in self and others by college students and professors. The Psychological Record, 44, 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSNOW R. L, & ROSNOW, M. (1995). Writing papers in psychology (3rd ed.). Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHEA, C. (1993). What’s happened to writing skills? The Chronicle of Higher Education, February 3, A33–34.

  • SINGHAL, A. C. (1982). Factors in students’ dishonesty. Psychological Reports, 51, 2–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY (1990). Special issue: Psychologists teach writing, 17.

  • WHITE, E. M. (1993). Too many campuses want to sweep student plagiarism under the rug. The Chronicle of Higher Education, February 24, A44.

  • ZENHAUSERN, R. (1978). Imagery, cerebral dominance, and style of thinking: Unified field model. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 2–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Roig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roig, M. Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized?. Psychol Rec 47, 113–122 (1997).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: