Abstract
This is a demonstration of an idiographic procedure that makes very accurate quantitative predictions of one person’s specific actions during a task. In June, 1988, I completed Condition 1 for each of eight different runs of a two-condition pursuit tracking task. Using data from Condition 1, when only the control handle affected the position of the cursor, I estimated the constants in the model of behavior from perceptual control theory, then I used the model to predict the results for Condition 2, when a random disturbance would also affect the cursor. Every five years I will do two of the eight predicted runs; I did two of them in July, 1993. Correlations between 1800 pairs of predicted and actual handle positions were .998 for the first run, and .997 for the second. Data from the model and me were nearly indistinguishable. I briefly discuss some misconceptions about data like these.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BOURBON, W.T., COPELAND, K. E., DYER, V. R., HARMAN, W. K., & MOSLEY, B. L. (1990). On the accuracy and reliability of predictions by control-system theory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 1331–1338.
BOURBON, W. T., & POWERS, W. T. (1993). Models and their worlds. Closed Loop: Threads From Csgnet, 3(1), 47–72. (Available from the authors: W. T. Bourbon. 272.Bellaire Blvd.; Houston, T. 77025. W. T. Powers. 7. Ridge Place, C. 510. Durango, Co 81301.)
HERSHBERGER, W. A. (Ed.) (1989). Volitional action: Conation and control. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
MARKEN, R. S. (Ed.) (1990). Purposeful behavior: The control theory approach. [Special issue]. American Behavioral Scientist, 34 No. 1.
MARKEN, R. S. (Ed.) (1992). Mind readings: Experimental studies of purpose. Chapel Hill, NC: New View.
PAVLOSKI, R. P., BARRON, G. T., & HOGUE, M. A. (1990). Reorganization: Learning and attention in a hierarchy of control systems. American Behavioral Scientist, 34(1), 32–54.
POWERS, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.
POWERS, W. T. (1978). Quantitative analysis of purposive behavior: Some spadework at the foundations of experimental psychology. Psychological Review, 85, 417–438.
POWERS, W. T. (1989). Quantitative measurement of volition: A pilot study. In W. A. Hershberger (Ed.), Volitional action: Conation and control (pp. 315–332). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
POWERS, W. T. (1990). Living control systems: Selected papers of William T Powers. Chapel Hill, NC: New View.
POWERS, W. T. (1992). Living control systems II: Selected papers of William T. Powers. Chapel Hill, NC: New View.
RODRIGUES, M. A., & LEE, M. H. (Eds.) (1994). Perceptual Control Theory Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Perceptual Control Theory. Gregynog, The University of Wales. The University of Wales, Aberystwyth.
RUNKEL, P. J. (1990). Casting nets and testing specimens: Two grand methods of psychology. New York: Praeger.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I thank Dennis Delprato for reviewing earlier drafts of this paper and giving me many helpful suggestions for improving it.
PCT is discussed on a “Listerv” electronic mail network, the Control Systems Group Network (Csgnet). The Internet address is: CSG-L@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU, the Bitnet address is: CSG-L@UIUCVMD.BITNET. The list is also available as a NetNews (Usernet) newsgroup under BIT.SCI.PURPOSIVE-BEHAVIOR.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bourbon, W.T. On the Accuracy and Reliability of Predictions by Perceptual Control Theory: Five Years Later. Psychol Rec 46, 39–47 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395162
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395162