Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behavior Modeling Training and Generalization: Interaction of Learning Point Type and Number of Modeling Scenarios

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two types of learning points (summary label and rule code) were crossed with either one modeled situation or three modeled situations in a behavior modeling training experiment. The dependent variable was degree of generalization within the experimental context, as measured by a behavioral checklist. The results, based on 80 undergraduate volunteer subjects was a significant, F(1, 76) = 7.94, p <.05, interaction effect, attributable entirely to the superiority of the rule code and multiple model condition. The implication for training programs wishing to improve generalization is that a more detailed set of cueing guidelines (e.g., rule code learning points) enables the trainee to benefit more from multiple modeling scenarios than a less detailed set of linguistic cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BALDWIN, T. T. (1992). Effects of alternative modeling strategies on outcomes of interpersonal-skills training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 147–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BANDURA, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • BURKE, M. J., & DAY, R. R. (1986). A cumulative study of the effectiveness of managerial training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 232–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLARK, R. E., & VOGEL, A. (1985). Transfer of training principles for instructional design. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 33, 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • DECKER, R. J. (1980). Effects of symbolic coding and rehearsal in behavior modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 627–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DECKER, R. J. (1982). The enhancement of behavior modeling training of supervisory skills by the inclusion of retention processes. Personnel Psychology, 32, 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DECKER, R. J. (1984). Effects of different symbolic coding stimuli in behavior modeling training. Personnel Psychology, 37, 711–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DECKER, P. J., & NATHAN, B. R. (1985). Behavior modeling training: Principles and applications. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOLDSTEIN, A. P., & SORCHER, M. (1974). Changing supervisor behavior. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOLDSTEIN, I. L., & MUSICANTE, G. R. (1986). The applicability of a training transfer model to issues concerning rater training. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 83–98). Lexington, MA: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOGAN, P. M., HAKEL, M. D., & DECKER, P. J. (1986). Effects of trainee-generated versus trainer-provided rule codes on generalization in behavior-modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 469–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KEPPEL, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researchers handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • KIRKPATRICK, D. L. (1967). Evaluation of training. In R. L. Craig & L. R. Bittel (Eds.), Training and development handbook (pp. 301–319). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • LATHAM, G. P., & SAARI, L. M. (1979). Application of social-learning theory to training supervisors through behavior modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology 64, 238–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCGEHEE, W., & TULLAR, W. L. (1978). A note on evaluating behavior modification and behavior modeling as industrial training techniques. Personnel Psychology, 31, 477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEYER, H. H., & RAICH, M. S. (1983). An objective evaluation of a behavior modeling program. Personnel Psychology, 36, 755–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTSON, I. T. (1990). Behaviour modeling: Its record and potential in training and development. British Journal of Management, 1, 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RUSSELL, J. S., WEXLEY, K. N., & HUNTER, J. E. (1984). Questioning the effectiveness of behavior modeling training program in an industrial setting. Personnel Psychology, 31, 477–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • STOKES, T. R., & BAER, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Inland Container Corporation, 4030 Vincennes Road, Indianapolis, IN, 46268, USA

    Scott E. Bryant

  2. University of Southern Mississippi, USA

    Stephen K. Fox

Authors
  1. Scott E. Bryant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen K. Fox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bryant, S.E., Fox, S.K. Behavior Modeling Training and Generalization: Interaction of Learning Point Type and Number of Modeling Scenarios. Psychol Rec 45, 495–503 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395157

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395157

Search

Navigation