Abstract
Eight college students were trained in a sequential response to two nonsense syllable pairs B1–B2 and B2–B3. They were then tested to determine whether an untrained, novel three-response sequence emerged as a result of the spontaneous combination of the two explicitly trained two-response sequences (i.e., B1–B2 + B2–B3 becomes B1–B2–B3). All subjects demonstrated this three-response sequence performance. Four experimental subjects were then trained in a set of conditional discriminations, using a matching-to-sample procedure (i.e., A1–B1, A1–C1, A2–B2, A2–C2, A3–B3, A3–C3). All four subsequently displayed the formation of three equivalence relations in nonreinforced testing (i.e., A1–B1–C1, A2–B2–C2, A3–B3–C3). This was followed by testing for a transfer, through equivalence, of the sequential responses, for both nonsense syllable pairs and triples. All experimental subjects showed this transfer (i.e., C1–C2, C2–C3, and C1–C2-C3). The control subjects, however, who had not received the conditional discrimination training and equivalence testing, all failed to show this transfer. A connectionist model was then designed to simulate the obtained data. After suitable explicit training on up to four stimulus sets, the model was capable of correctly responding to the sequence, equivalence, and transfer tests, after exposure to only the training stages of a fifth set. The wider implications of connectionism for behavior analysis are also considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and rational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.
BARNES, D., & HAMPSON, P. J. (1993a). Learning to learn: The contribution of behaviour analysis to connectionist models of inferential skill in humans. In Neural Computing Research and Applications: Part One (pp. 129–138). Iop, England.
BARNES, D., & HAMPSON, P. J. (1993b). Stimulus equivalence and connectionism: Implications for behavior analysis and cognitive science. The Psychological Record, 43, 617–638.
BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19–31.
BARNES, D., MCCULLAGH, P. D., & KEENAN, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 19–30.
CHOMSKY, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
CHOMSKY, N. (1959). Review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.
DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C., & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.
DONAHOE, J. W., BURGOES, J. E., & PALMER, C. P. (1993). A selectionist approach to reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 17–40.
DUGDALE, N., & LOWE, C. F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice (pp. 115–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
EYSENCK, M.W., & KEANE, M. T. (1990). Cognitive psychology: A students’ handbook. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
HAYES, S.C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385–392.
HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues of verbal behavior: The first international institute on verbal relations (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, No. 11. 1383–1395.
HAYES, S. C., KOHLENBERG, B. S., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119–137.
HETHERINGTON, P. A., & SEIDERBERG, M. S. (1989). Is there “catastrophic interference” in connectionist networks? Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 173–178). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
LAZAR, R. (1977). Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 27. 381–392.
LAZAR, R. M., & KOTLARCHYK, B. J. (1986). Second-order control of sequence-class equivalences in children. Behavioral Processes, 13, 205–215.
MACKAY, H. A., & SIDMAN, M. (1984). Teaching new behaviors via equivalence relations. In P. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 493–513). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1981). Retrieving general and specific information from stored knowledge of specifics. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 170–172.
MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1988). Explorations in parallel distributed processing, A handbook of models, programs, and exercises. London England: Mit Press.
RUMMELHART, D. E., HINTON, G. E., & WILLIAMS, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536.
SCHUSTERMAN, R. J., & KASTAK, D. (1993). A california sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823–839.
SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and Integration of behavioral units. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
SIDMAN, M.(1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 92–114). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
SIDMAN, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In Steven C. Hayes & Linda J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 15–27). Reno, NV: Context Press.
SIDMAN, M., RAUZIN, R., LAZAR, R., CUNNINGHAM, S., TAILBY, W., & CARRIGAN, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21–42.
SKINNER, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. London, England: Jonathan Cape.
STEELE, D. M., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.
STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585–598.
WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125–144.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cullinan, V.A., Barnes, D., Hampson, P.J. et al. A Transfer of Explicitly and Nonexplicitly Trained Sequence Responses Through Equivalence Relations: An Experimental Demonstration and Connectionist Model. Psychol Rec 44, 559–585 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395144
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395144