Skip to main content
Log in

On Overconfidence in Multiple-Choice Tests

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Zakay and Glicksohn have recently found a negative relationship between overconfidence and performance in a multiple-choice test. It is argued here that, contrary to what they say, the result could be artificial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANTHONEY, T. R. (1986). A discrepancy in objective and subjective measures of knowledge: Do some medical students with learning problems delude themselves? Medical Education, 20, 17–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KOEHLER, R. A. (1974). Overconfidence on probabilistic tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 11, 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RONIS, D. L., & YATES, J. F. (1987). Components of probability judgment accuracy: Individual consistency and effects of subject matter and assessment method. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZAKAY, D., & GLICKSOHN, J. (1992). Overconfidence in a multiple-choice test and its relationship to achievement. The Psychological Record, 42, 519–524.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hutchinson, T.P. On Overconfidence in Multiple-Choice Tests. Psychol Rec 44, 253–255 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395131

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395131

Navigation