Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Superstitious Conditioning: A Replication and Extension of Neuringer (1970)

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After immediate, response-dependent reinforcers were delivered for the first three key pecks made by experimentally naive pigeons, a variable-time schedule of response-independent reinforcement maintained key pecking. This result also was reported by Neuringer (1970). A stimulus change did not follow any key peck, and as a result the experiment demonstrated that response maintenance was not due to conditioned reinforcing effects of a light flash that was produced by each key peck in Neuringer’s experiment. An analysis of the temporal relation between responses and response-independent reinforcers showed that absolute temporal contiguity rarely, if ever, occurred. The data further suggest that any appeal to adventitious temporal contiguity in accounts of superstitious conditioning must be refined to include specification of actual temporal response-reinforcer relations and a modified definition of “contiguous.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APPEL, J. B., & HISS, R. H. (1962). The discrimination of contingent from non-contingent reinforcement. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 37–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FENNER, D. (1980). The role of contingencies and “principles of behavioral variation” in pigeons’ pecking. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FLESHLER, M., & HOFFMAN, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 529–530.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GLEESON, S. (1987). Degraded response-reinforcer relations: Effects of dependency and temporal contiguity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLEESON, S., & LATTAL, K. A. (1988). Response-reinforcer relations and the maintenance of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 383–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAMMOND, L. J. (1980). The effect of contingency upon the appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 297–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HENTON, W. W., & IVERSEN, I. H. (1978). Classical conditioning and operart conditioning. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1966). Superstition: A corollary of the principles of operant conditioning. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 33–51). New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • HURSH, S. R., NAVARICK, D. J., & FANTINO, E. (1974). “Automaintenance”: The role of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 117–124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LATTAL, K. A., & MAXEY, G. C. (1971). Some effects of response independent reinforcers in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 225–231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • NEURINGER, A. J. (1970). Superstitious key pecking after three peck-produced reinforcements. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 127–134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H., & BAUM, W. M. (1972). Effects of alternative reinforcement: Does the source matter? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 231–241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • RESCORLA, R. A., & SKUCY, J. C. (1969). Effect of response-independent reinforcers during extinction. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RICHARDS, R. W. (1981). A comparison of signaled and unsignaled delay of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 145–152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIZEMORE, O. J., & LATTAL, K. A. (1978). Unsignalled delay of reinforcement in variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 169–175.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • STADDON, J. E. R., & SIMMELHAG, V. L. (1971). The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, B. A. (1983). Revising the principle of reinforcement. Behaviorism, 11, 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZEILER, M. D. (1968). Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 405–414.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814-4799, USA

    Suzanne Gleeson, Kennon A. Lattal & Karen S. Williams

  2. West Virginia University, USA

    Suzanne Gleeson, Kennon A. Lattal & Karen S. Williams

Authors
  1. Suzanne Gleeson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kennon A. Lattal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karen S. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gleeson, S., Lattal, K.A. & Williams, K.S. Superstitious Conditioning: A Replication and Extension of Neuringer (1970). Psychol Rec 39, 563–571 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395084

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395084

Search

Navigation