Skip to main content
Log in

Authoritarianism Research is Alive And Well—In Australia: A Review

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After the work of Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, & Sanford was published in 1950 much research into authoritarianism was done. The return on the effort deployed, however, was disappointing and the topic is now a relatively minor one in psychology. Three Australian researchers, however, have continued with extensive programs of research in the area—Ray, Rigby, and Heaven. Some broad view is therefore given of the major themes in the work of each of these researchers. It is pointed out that all three researchers have produced new scales to measure various conceptions of authoritarianism that have some potential to reinvigorate research in this area. Some unexpected discoveries are also mentioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADORNO, T. W., FRENKEL-BRUNSWIK, E., LEVINSON, D. J., & SANFORD, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALTEMEYER, R. A. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROOKER, P. (1985). The Nazi Fuehrerprinzip: A Weberian analysis. Political Science, 37, 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, R. (1965). Social psychology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHRISTIE, R., HAVEL, J., & SEIDENBERG, B. (1956). Is the F scale irreversible? Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology 56, 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHRISTIE, R., & JAHODA, M. (1954). Studies in the scope and method of “The authoritarian personality.” Glencoe, Il: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEAVEN, P. C. L. (1985). Construction and validation of a measure of authoritarian personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 545–551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HEAVEN, P. C. L. (1986). Directiveness and dominance. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 273–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEAVEN, P. C. L. (1987). Authoritarianism, dominance and need for achievement. Australian Journal of Psychology, 39, 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JACKSON, D. N. (1967). Personality Research Form manual. New York: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JONES, J. M., & RAY, J. J. (1984). Validating the schoolchildren’s attitude to authority and authoritarianism scales. Journal of Social Psycholology 122, 141–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCKINNEY, D. W. (1973). The authoritarian personality studies. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J. (1970). The development and validation of a balanced dogmatism scale. Australian Journal of Psychology 22, 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J. (1972). A new balanced F scale-and its relation to social class. Australian Psychologist, 7, 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J. (1973). Conservatism, authoritarianism and related variables: A review and an empirical study. Chapter 2 in G. D. Wilson (Ed.), The psychology of conservatism. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J. (1976). Do authoritarians hold authoritarian attitudes? Human Relations, 29, 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J. (1980). Achievement motivation as an explanation of authoritarian behaviour: Data from Australia, South Africa, California, England, and Scotland. In P. C. L. Heaven (Ed.), Authoritarianism: South African Studies. Bloemfontein: De Villiers.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J. (1981). Authoritarianism, dominance and assertiveness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 390–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J. (1983). Half of all authoritarians are left-wing: A reply to Eysenck and Stone. Political Psychology, 4, 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J. (1984a). Half of all racists are left-wing. Political Psychology, 5, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J. (1984b). Achievement motivation as a source of racism, conservation and authoritarianism. Journal of Social Psychology, 123, 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J., & JONES, J. M. (1983). Attitude to authority and authoritarianism among schoolchildren. Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 199–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J., & LOVEJOY, F. H. (1983). The behavioral validity of some recent measures of authoritarianism. Journal of Social Psychology, 120, 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAY, J. J., & LOVEJOY, F. H. (1986). A comparison of three scales of directiveness. Journal Social of Psychology, 126, 249–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIGBY, K. (1984). Acceptance of authority and directiveness as indicators of authoritarianism: A new framework. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RIGBY, K. (1987a). Directiveness and acceptance of authority. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 235–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RIGBY, K. (1987b). An authority behavior inventory. Journal of Personality Assesment, 51, 615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROKEACH, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ray, J.J. Authoritarianism Research is Alive And Well—In Australia: A Review. Psychol Rec 39, 555–561 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395083

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395083

Navigation