Skip to main content
Log in

Need for a Theoretical Justification of Humanistic Commitment Components in Behavior Therapy

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although behavior therapies are putatively based on traditional learning paradigms, standard clinical practice with outpatient clients presenting problems of personal adjustment routinely requires a voluntary commitment to collaboration (CTC) with the therapist (Harcum, Burijon, & Watson, 1988). Nevertheless, in the various summaries of the theoretical justification, even for cognitive behavior therapy, the mainstream literature generally omits this presumably necessary humanistic component and includes only acceptable principles from traditional learning paradigms. Development of a comprehensive theory of behavior therapy is prevented by this failure to acknowledge the need for a theoretical justification of CTC. This avoidance is attributed to a fear of being considered unscientifiC., fostered by traditional graduate training in psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AGRAS, W. S., KAZDIN, A. E., & WILSON, G. T. (1979). Behavior therapy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • BANDURA, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behavior Research and Therapy. (1987). 25(3), (inside back cover).

  • EPSTEIN, L. H., & WING, R. R. (1984). Behavioral contracting: Health behaviors. In C. M. Franks (Ed.), New developments in behavior therapy: From research to clinical application (pp. 409–449). New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERICKSON, R. C. (1973). “Free will” and clinical research. Psychotherapy: Theory Research, and Practice, 10, 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1964). The nature of behavior therapy. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), Experiments in behavior therapy (pp. 1–15). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRANKS, C. M., & BRADY, J. P. (1970). Editorial: What is Behavior Therapy and why a new Journal? Behavior Therapy, 1, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN, A. (1987). Cognitive therapy: An overview. In A. Fromm & V. B. Greenwood (Eds.), Cognitive therapy (pp. 13–35). New York: Human Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLASSER, W. (1965). Reality therapy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREENWALD, H. (1973). Decision therapy. New York: Peter H. Wyden.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARCUM, E. R. (1975). Serial learning and paralearning. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARCUM, E. R. (1988). Defensive reactance of psychologists to a metaphysical foundation for integrating different psychologies. The Journal of Psychology, 122, 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HARCUM, E. R. (1989). Commitment to collaboration as a prerequisite for existential commonality in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 26, 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HARCUM, E. R., BURIJON, B. N., & WATSON, N. (1988). Client responsibility in the practitioners’ operational definition of behavior therapy. Journal of Human Behavior and Learning, 25, 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARDING, J. (1976). Behavioristic and humanistic approaches: Compatible or incompatible. In A. Wandersman, P. Poppen, & D. Ricks (Eds.), Humanism and behaviorism: Dialogue and growth (pp. 193–206). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (1984). But whose behaviorism is it? Contemporary Psychology, 29, 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information for authors. (1987). Behavior Therapy, 18(2), (inside back cover).

  • KANFER, F. H., & HAGERMAN, S. M. (1985). Behavior therapy and the information-processing paradigm. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 3–33). Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOCH, S. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: Lessons of a century qua “Science.” American Psychologist, 36, 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, P. E. (1984). Interbehaviorism in psychology and in the philosophy of science. The Psychological Record, 34, 455–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LOCKE, E. A. (1971). Is “behavior therapy” behavioristic? Psychological Bulletin, 76, 318–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MAHONEY, M. J. (1985). Psychotherapy and human change processes. In M. J. Mahoney & A. Freeman (Eds.), Cognition and psychotherapy (pp. 3–48). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MASLOW, A. H. (1965). Humanistic science and transcendent experiences. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 5, 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MASTERS, J. C., BURISH, T. G., HOLLON, S. D., & RIMM, D. C. (1987). Behavior therapy: Techniques and empirical findings (3rd ed.). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.

  • O’HARA, M. (1986). Comment on Carl Roger’s “Toward a more human science of the person.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25, 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PAPAJOHN, J. C. (1982). Intensive behavior therapy. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • POLKINGHORNE, D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PROCHASKA, J. O., & Dl ClEMENTE, C. C. (1986). In W. R. Miller & Nick Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviors (pp. 3–27). New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.

  • RICKS, D. F., & FLEMING, P. (1976). Humanistic and behavioral approaches from a life history perspective. In A. Wandersman, P. Poppen, & D. Ricks (Eds.) Humanism and behaviorism: Dialogue and growth (pp. 269–287). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • RICKS, D. F., WANDERSMAN, A., & POPPEN, P. J. (1976). Humanism and behaviorism: Toward new syntheses. In A. Wandersman, P. J. Poppen, & D. F. Ricks (Eds.), Humanism and behaviorism: Dialogue and growth (pp. 383–402). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROGERS, C. R., & SKINNER, B. F. (1956). Some issues concerning the control of human behavior: A symposium. Science, 124, 1057–1066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RUBEN, D. H. (1986). The “interbehavioral” approach to treatment. Journal of Contemporary Psychology, 16, 62–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RYCHLAK, J. F. (1984). Newtonianism and the professional responsibility of psychologists: Who speaks for humanity? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15, 82–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, N. W. (1984). Fundamentals of interbehavioral psychology. The Psychological Record, 34, 479–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STAATS, A. W. (1981). Paradigmatic behaviorism: Unified theory construction methods, and the Zeitgeist of separatism. American Psychologist, 36, 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WILSON, G. T., & O’LEARY, K. D. (1980). Principles of behavior therapy. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • YALOM, I. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.

  • ZIMMERMAN, D. W. (1984). A note on the completeness of the scientific method. The Psychological Record, 34, 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harcum, E.R., Burijon, B.N. & Watson, N. Need for a Theoretical Justification of Humanistic Commitment Components in Behavior Therapy. Psychol Rec 39, 493–500 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395077

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395077

Navigation