Skip to main content
Log in

Blocking Effects in Two-Choice Discrimination Tasks in Rhesus Monkeys Macaca Mulatta

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present experiments investigated blocking effects in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a discrimination learning paradigm using a single stimulus modality. Two experimental chambers were used. In one the monkeys were required to operate a joystick in order to manipulate a Pacman figure to consume one of two stimuli (S+ and S-) appearing on a video screen. In the other the monkeys were required to press Plexiglas panels mounted in front of the screens to indicate their choice of the stimuli. Correct responses resulted in the delivery of marshmallows. Results indicated (a) consistent occurrence of blocking, (b) no unblocking due to increased magnitude of reward, and (c) no differences due to task requirements in the two different chambers. These studies extend our knowledge of blocking effects to monkeys and provide novel procedures for using monkeys in basic learning research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CAPALDI, E. J., VERRY, D. R. & NAWROCKI, T. M. (1982). Alley section effects of blocking. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20(2), 109–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’AMATO, M. R., & FAZZARO, J. (1966). Attention and cue-producing behavior in the monkey. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 469–473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • EGGER, M. C., & MILLER, N. E. (1962). Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of information value and reliability of the stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HADDAD, N. R., WALKENBACH, J., PRESTON, M., & STRONG, R. (1981). Stimulus control in a simple instrumental task: The role of internal and external stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 12, 509–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAGGBLOOM, S. J. (1981). Blocking in successive differential conditioning: Prior acquisition of control by internal cues blocks the acquisition of brightness. Learning and Motivation, 12, 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KAMIN, L. L. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOLORDO, V. M., JACOBS, W. J., & FOREE, D. D. (1982). Failure to block control by a relevant stimulus. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10(2), 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1965). Incident cue learning in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1971). An analysis of overshadowing and blocking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82(4), 276–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J., & DICKINSON, A. (1979). Instrumental (type II) conditioning. In A. Dickinson & R. Boakes (Eds.), Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J., & TURNER, C. (1971). Blocking as a function of novelty of Cs and predictability of UCS. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 359–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NEELY, J. H., & WAGNER, A. R. (1974). Attenuation of blocking with shifts in reward: The involvement of schedule-generated contextual cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 751–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAY, B. A. (1967). The course of acquisition of a live-tilt discrimination by Rhesus monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 17–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. Balck & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II. Current research and theory New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • SERAGANIAN, P., & VOM SAAL, W. (1969). Blocking the development of stimulus control when stimuli indicate periods of nonreinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 767–772.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SUTHERLAND, N. S., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TENNANT, W. A., & BITTERMAN, M. E. (1975). Blocking and overshadowing in two species of fish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 22–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • TRABASSO, T., & BOWER, G. H. (1968). Attention in learning theory and research. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • VOM SAAL, W., & JENKINS, H. M. (1970). Blocking the development of stimulus control. Learning and Motivation, 1, 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, B. (1984). Stimulus control and associative learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42(3), 469–483.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ZANICH, M. L., & FOWLER, H. (1978). Transfer from Pavlovian appetitive to instrumental appetitive conditioning: Signalling versus discrepancy interpretations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 37–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, S.L., Haddad, N.F. & Strobel, D.A. Blocking Effects in Two-Choice Discrimination Tasks in Rhesus Monkeys Macaca Mulatta. Psychol Rec 39, 471–481 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395075

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395075

Navigation