Abstract
A study was conducted in which two birds (pigeons) were trained to respond on a fixed-ratio (FR) 100 baseline, and three birds were trained to respond on a FR 20 baseline. After stable baseline performance, a single FR 10 was interpolated into the FR 100 baselines while a single FR 200 (FR 250 for one bird) was interpolated into the FR 20 baselines. This was called the uncued condition. The same interpolations were replicated in another condition except that a different stimulus was experimentally associated with the interpolated ratio (cued condition). The results showed that the pause following the uncued interpolated ratio was generally the shortest in the session compared to the postreinforcement pauses for the remaining ratios. This effect occurred regardless of the relative size of the interpolated ratio, although it was absent when the interpolated ratio was cued. Moreover, pauses in those ratio components following the uncued interpolated ratio were slightly reduced, suggesting that the interpolation procedure also produced field effects. The results are discussed in terms of their theoretical relevance to variable-ratio schedule performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ALFERINK, L. A., & CROSSMAN, E. K. (1978). Mixed fixed-ratio schedules Iii: The postreinforcement and postprime pauses. The Psychological Record, 28, 137–145.
CROSSMAN, E. K. (1971). The effects of fixed-ratio size in multiple and mixed fixed-ratio schedules. The Psychological Record, 21, 535–544.
CROSSMAN, E. K., BONEM, E. J., & PHELPS, B. J. (1987). A comparison of response patterns on fixed-, variable-, and random-ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 395–406.
CROSSMAN, E. K., & SILVERMAN, L. T. (1973). Altering the proportion of components in a mixed fixed-ratio schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 273–279.
CROSSMAN, E. K., STEPHENSON, M. R., & LYNCH, H. L. (1980). An intelligent Pet interface for environmental control and data acquisition and analysis. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 238–240.
FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
FINDLEY, J. D. (1962). An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 113–166.
GRIFFITHS, R. R., & THOMPSON, T. (1973). The post-reinforcement pause: A misnomer. The Psychological Record, 23, 229–235.
KEEHN, J. D. (1965). Temporal alteration in the white rat? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8, 161–168.
REYNOLDS, G. S. (1961). Behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 57–71.
SCHOENFELD, W. N., & FARMER, J. (1970). Reinforcement schedules and the behavioral stream. In W. N. Schoenfeld & J. Farmer (Eds.), The theory of reinforcement schedules. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
WEISSMAN, A. (1960). The behavioral effects of repeated exposure to three mixed extinction schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 3, 115–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Serna, R.W., Crossman, E.K. Interpolation of a Single Fixed-Ratio Component in a Baseline of Fixed-Ratio Schedules. Psychol Rec 39, 271–284 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395068
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395068