Skip to main content
Log in

Backward Second-Order Conditioning in Flavor Aversion Learning

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three experiments are reported which addressed the possibility that a neutral-flavor stimulus (CS2) can become aversive by pairing it with a previously established aversive-flavor stimulus (CS1). Unlike previous higher-order conditioning studies in which CSl followed CS2 (CS2-CS1 pairings), the present studies reversed this order (CS1-CS2 pairings) to determine the extent that backward second-order conditioning produces an aversion to CS2. In Experiment 1, rats received zero, one, or three pairings of a walnut-flavored solution (CS1) with LiCI. The walnut flavor was then presented just prior to forced consumption of a neutral lemon-flavored solution (CS2). A significant aversion developed to lemon only when three walnut-LiCI pairings were used. Experiment 2 manipulated the flavors used as CS1 and CS2 (lemon or walnut). Results indicated that regardless of the flavors used, a significant aversion developed to CS2 as a result of CS1-CS2 pairings. In Experiment 3, the level of aversion to CS2 with the backward higher-order conditioning paradigm was compared to forward higher-order conditioning. An unconditioned stimulus (UCS) alone treatment and a handling control treatment were included to evaluate the level of neophobia to novel flavors. Results showed that the percentages of CS2 (lemon) flavor consumed relative to total consumption was significantly lower in the backward higher order conditioning group than in the UCS alone and handling control treatments. The forward higher-order conditioning group was quite variable and differed from the control groups at the.08 level. These findings are discussed in terms of higher-order conditioning and flavor aversion learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BEST, P. J., BEST, M. R., & MICKEY, G. A. (1973). Conditioned aversion to distinct environmental stimuli resulting from gastrointestinal distress. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 85, 250–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DOMJAN, M., & GREGG, B. (1977). Long-delay backward taste-aversion conditioning with lithium. Physiology and Behavior, 18, 59–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GORDON, W. C. (1981). Mechanisms of cue-induced enhancement. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • GORDON, W. C. (1983). Malleability of memory in animals. In R. L. Mellgren (Ed.), Animal cognition and behavior. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • GORDON, W. C., MCGINNIS, C. M., & WEAVER, M. S. (1985). The effect of cueing after backward conditioning trials. Learning and Motivation, 16, 444–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HETH, C. D., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1973). Simultaneous and backward fear conditioning in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 82, 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KAMIN, L. J. (1963). Retention of an incompletely learned avoidance response: Some further analysis. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 713–718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KIMBLE, G. A. (1961). Hilgard and Marquis’ conditioning and learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLEIN, S. B., MIKULKA, P. J., & HAMEL, K. (1976). Influence of sucrose preexposure on acquisition of a conditioned aversion. Behavioral Biology, 16, 99–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LINDQUIST, E. F. (1956). Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • RESCORLA, R. A. (1981). Pavlovian second-order conditioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • RESCORLA, R. A., & CUNNINGHAM, C. L. (1978). Within compound flavor associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 267–275.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RIZLEY, R. C., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1972). Associations in higher order conditioning and sensory preconditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 81, 1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SPETCH, M., WILKIE, D., & PINEL, J. (1981). Backward conditioning: A reevaluation of the empirical evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 163–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SIEGEL, S., & DOMJAN, M. (1971). Backward conditioning as an inhibitory procedure. Learning and Motivation, 2, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WAGNER, A. R., & TERRY, W. S. (1975). Backward conditioning to a Cs following an expected vs. a surprising Ucs. Animal Learning and Behavior, 3, 370–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mowrer, R.R., Krug, D.E. & Klein, S.B. Backward Second-Order Conditioning in Flavor Aversion Learning. Psychol Rec 38, 259–269 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395022

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395022

Navigation