Abstract
Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology is intrinsically theoretical. Its beginnings are with naive self-evidence, basically verbal report, expressed repeatedly, as if in this manner valid solutions to problems will necessarily evolve, in a paradoxical fashion. It is reducible to Q-methodology: Husserl’s perspectives and essences are comparable to the quantized operant factors of Q, which are subject to Niels Bohr’s Principle of Complementarity, and also involve paradoxes. Some implications for Gestalt psychology, Dasein-analysis, and Carl Rogers’ Client-Centered Counseling are considered.
Husserl’s phenomenology, in any of its forms, and Q-methodology are on the same footing except for the denial of consciousness as substantive in Q, and its replacement by communicability. Q-technique stands uniquely as a new probabilistic that opened the door to quantum theory for subjectivity, just as Max Born’s new probabilistic opened the door for quantum physics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ARGUELLES, JOSE (1986). The Mayan factor: Path beyond technology. Boulder, CO: Bear and Co.
BOSS, MEDARD (1963). Psychoanalysis and daseinsanalysis. (L. B. Lefebre, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
BUCKLEY, W. (Ed.) (1968). Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist: A sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine.
CHOMSKY, NOAM (1969). American power and the new mandarins. New York: Penguin.
GLEICK, JAMES (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Macmillan.
GRIFFIN, DAVID R. (Ed.) (1986). Physics and the ultimate significance of time. New York: State University of New York.
HEIDEGGER, MARTIN (1927). Being and time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
HONIG, WERNER K. (1966). Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofits.
HUSSERL, EDMUND (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1938)
INNIS, HAROLD A. (1951). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
JAMES, WILLIAM (1891). The principles ofpsychology (2 vol.). London: MacMillan.
JENNINGS, J. L. (1986). Husserl revisited: The forgotten distinction between psychology and phenomenology. American Psychologist, 41(11), 1231–1240.
KATZ, D. (1935). The world of colour. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.
KATZ, DAVID, & STEPHENSON, WILLIAM (1937). Experiments on elasticity. British J. Psychology (General), 28, 190–194.
KIERKEGAARD, SOREN (1941). Concluding unscientific postscript. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1846)
KIERKEGAARD, SOREN (1946). Either/or: A fragment of life (2 vol.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
KOFFKA, KURT (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.
LAING, R. D., & ESTERSON, A. (1964). Families of schizophrenics (Vol. 1). Sanity, madness and the family. London: Tairstock Press.
NOBLE, HOLCOMB B. (Ed.) (1987). The coming era in science: The ultimate exploration. New York: Macmillan.
PAIS, ABRAHAM (1986). Inward bound: Of matter and forces in the physical world. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
POOLE, ROGER (1972). Towards deep subjectivity. New York: Harper & Row.
POPPER, KARLR. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
PRIGOGINE, ILYA (1980). From being to becoming: Time and complexity in the physical sciences. New York: W. H. Freeman.
ROGERS, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
ROGERS, C. R. (1972). A research program in client-centered therapy. In S. R. Brown & D. Brenner (Eds.), Science, psychology, and communication (pp. 312–326). New York: Teachers College.
ROGERS, C. R. (1985). Humanists celebrate gains, goals. Monitor, May, 16–18.
ROSENTHAL, D. (Ed.) (1963). The Genain quadruplets: A case study and theoretical analysis of heredity and environment in schizophrenia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (England).
SANTILLANA, G. DE, & DECHEND, H. VON (1969). Hamlet’s mill: An essay on myth and the frame of time. Boston: Gambit.
SPEARMAN, CHARLES E. (1923). The nature of Intelligence’ and the principles of cognition. London: MacMillan.
STEARN, GERALD E. (1967). McLuhan hot & cool. New York: Dial.
STEPHENSON, WILLIAM (1935). Technique of factor analysis. Nature, (London) 136, 297.
STEPHENSON, W. (1936). The foundations of psychometry: Four factor systems. Psychometrika, 1, 195–209.
STEPHENSON, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University Press.
STEPHENSON, W. (1954). Psychoanalysis and Q-methodology. (Unpublished manuscript.)
STEPHENSON, W. (1967). The play theory of mass communication. Chicago: University Press.
STEPHENSON, W. (1969). Foundations of communication theory. The Psychological Record, 19, 65–82.
STEPHENSON, W. (1971). Factors as operant subjectivity. In Papers in honor of P. Horst, Seattle: University of Washington.
STEPHENSON, W. (1974). Methodology of single case studies. J. Operational Psychiatry, V, 2, 3–16.
STEPHENSON, W. (1980). Consciring: Theory of subjective communicability. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 4 (chapter 1). London: Transaction Books.
STEPHENSON, W. (1982). Q-methodology, interbehavioral psychology, and quantum theory. The Psychological Record, 32, 235–248.
STEPHENSON, W. (1983). Quantum theory and Q-methodology: Fictionalistic and probabilistic theories conjoined. The Psychological Record, 33, 213–230.
STEPHENSON, W. (1984). Methodology for statements of problems: Kantor and Spearman conjoined. The Psychological Record, 34, 575–588.
STEPHENSON, W. (1986a). In the shadow of Marshall McLuhan. Nordicum Review of Nordic Mass Communications Research, No. 2. pp. 20–27.
STEPHENSON, W. (1986b). William James, Niels Bohr, and complemntarity: I -Concepts. The Psychological Record, 36, 519–527.
STEPHENSON, W. (1986c). William James, Niels Bohr, and complementarity: II -Pragmatics. The Psychological Record, 36, 529–543.
STEPHENSON, W. (1987). William James, Niels Bohr, and complementarity: III -Schrödinger’s cat. The Psychological Record, 37, 523–544.
STEPHENSON, W. (1988a). William James, Niels Bohr, and complementarity: IV -The significance of time. The Psychological Record, 38, 19–35.
STEPHENSON, W. (1988b). William James, Niels Bohr, and complementarity: V -Phenomenology of subjectivity. The Psychological Record, 38,.
WERNER, HEINZ (1948). Comparative development of mental development. New York: Follett.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stephenson, W. William James, Niels Bohr, and Complementarity: V - Phenomenology of Subjectivity. Psychol Rec 38, 203–219 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395016
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395016