Skip to main content
Log in

William James, Niels Bohr, and Complementarity: I—Concepts

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of complementarity was introduced by William James in 1891, and by physicist Niels Bohr in 1927, the latter probably without knowledge of the former. The phenomena were experienced as “gaps” in thought, and by the experiential observation that thought is divisible into transitive and substantive parts, providing evidence of complementarity. The most obvious phenomenon of psychology, that of thought, therefore requires quantum-theoretical exploration. Bohr was fascinated by the principle of complementarity and of the possibility of a new epistemology based upon it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BOHR, NIELS. (1934). Atomic theory and the description of nature. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOHR, NIELS. (1950). On the notions of causality and complementarity. Science, 111, 51–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HEISENBERG, WERNER. (1958). The representation of nature in contemporary physics. Daedalus, Summer, pp. 103–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOLTON, GERALD. (1973). Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOLTON, GERALD. (1975). In Owen Gingerich (Ed.), The nature of scientific discovery. Smithsonian Institute Symposium Series. Washington, DC.

  • JAMES, WILLIAM. (1891). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1–2). London: MacMillan.

  • KOFFKA, KURT. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORISON, S. E. (1942). Admiral of the ocean sea (Vols. 1–2). Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

  • OPPENHEIMER, J. ROBERT. (1953). Science and common understanding. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPEARMAN, C. E. (1937). Psychology down the ages. (Vols. 1–2). London: MacMillan.

  • TARASOV, D. M. (1980). Basic concepts of quantum mechanics. Moscow: MIR Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • TUVE, Merle A. (1967). Physics and the humanities—the verification of complementarity. In C. P. Haskins (Ed.), The search for understanding. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stephenson, W. William James, Niels Bohr, and Complementarity: I—Concepts. Psychol Rec 36, 519–527 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394970

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394970

Navigation