Skip to main content
Log in

The Status of the Subject

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In his latest book The View from Nowhere, Nagel intensifies his attack on an “excessive objectification” that would demystify our everyday interpretation of behavior by viewing mind and consciousness as simply surface manifestations of microphysical structures. What I argue is that while Nagel alerts us to the inherent insensitivity of scientific thinking, and to its obvious limitations in dealing with consciousness and the individuation of the organism, his efforts in The View from Nowhere are not much of an improvement upon it; that is, that the subject that Nagel would give us has no unity of psychological function that can be explained simply by ownership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • KRIPKE, S. (1972). Naming and necessity. In D. Davidson & G. Harmans (Eds.), Semantics and natural language (pp. 334–342). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAGEL, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAGEL, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muscari, P.G. The Status of the Subject. Psychol Rec 36, 467–470 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394966

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394966

Navigation