Skip to main content
Log in

An Examination of Some Aspects of Knowledge-Assembly Theory

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present series of experiments examined the effects of the context of to-be-learned material on retention in light of the simultaneous activation formulation of knowledge-assembly theory. Experiment 1 manipulated the context of simple, declarative sentences through the use of cue words while controlling for words shared between sentence idea units and time of activation of idea units. Results indicated that context significantly influenced idea unit recall. Experiment 2 manipulated the context cues of pairs of sentences containing direct correspondence of content and found contextual cues to be powerful influences on recall of information. Experiment 3 controlled context and contrasted subjects’ recall of sentence pairs with and without direct correspondence and found no significant differences on any measure. Experiment 4 examined the effects of recency of activation on recall of idea units and found, in addition to a significantly greater amount of recall of meaningful context idea units, that as time between sentence idea units and cue words increased, so did recall. Experiment 5 examined recency of activation in sentence pairs containing direct correspondence of content. The results indicated that when distractor tasks were employed during the time interval between the presentation of the sentences in pairs, no significant differences were observed in recall associated with differing intervals of time between presentation of the sentences in pairs. Experiment 6 examined the effects of context on retention within paragraph structures, and results showed that context influenced recall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AUBLE, P. M., & FRANKS, J. J. (1978). The effects of effort toward comprehension on recall. Memory and Cognition, 6, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AUBLE, P. M., FRANKS, J. J., & SORACI, S. A. (1979). Effort toward comprehension: Elaboration or“aha!”? Memory and Cognition, 7, 426–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRANSFORD, J. D., & FRANKS, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRANSFORD, J. D., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRANSFORD, J. D., & MCCARRELL, N. S. (1974). A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension. In W. WEIMER & D. PALERMO (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLOVER, J. A., BRUNING, R. H., & PLAKE, B. S. (1982). Distinctiveness of encoding and recall of text materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 522–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOETZ, E. T., ANDERSON, R. C., & SCHALLERT, D. L. (1981). The representation of sentences in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES-ROTH, B. (1977). Evolution of cognition structures and processes. Psychological Review, 84, 260–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES-ROTH, B., & THORNDYKE, P. W. (1979). Integration of knowledge from text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES-ROTH, B., & WALKER, C. (1979). Configurai effects in human memory. Cognitive Science, 3, 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HYDE, T. S., & JENKINS, J. J. (1969). Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a test of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 472–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JENKINS, J. J. (1974). Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it! American Psychologist, 29, 785–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KINTSCH, W. (1979). On modeling comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 14, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KINTSCH, W., KOZMINSKY, E., STREBY, W. J., MCKOON, C., & KEENAN, J. M. (1975). Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 196–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEYER, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effect on recall. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEYER, B. J. F. (1981). Prose analysis: Procedures, purposes, and problems. (Prose Learning Series, Research Report No. 11). Tempe: Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, J. R., & KINTSCH, W. (1980). Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 335–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSS, B. A. (1981). The more the better?: Number of decisions as a determinant of memorability. Memory and Cognition, 9, 23–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WALSH, D. A., & JENKINS, J. J. (1973). Effects of orienting tasks on free recall in incidental learning:“Difficulty,”“effort,” and“process” explanations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 481–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monkowski, P.G., Glover, J.A. & Ronning, R.R. An Examination of Some Aspects of Knowledge-Assembly Theory. Psychol Rec 36, 185–202 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394940

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394940

Navigation