Abstract
The present series of experiments examined the effects of the context of to-be-learned material on retention in light of the simultaneous activation formulation of knowledge-assembly theory. Experiment 1 manipulated the context of simple, declarative sentences through the use of cue words while controlling for words shared between sentence idea units and time of activation of idea units. Results indicated that context significantly influenced idea unit recall. Experiment 2 manipulated the context cues of pairs of sentences containing direct correspondence of content and found contextual cues to be powerful influences on recall of information. Experiment 3 controlled context and contrasted subjects’ recall of sentence pairs with and without direct correspondence and found no significant differences on any measure. Experiment 4 examined the effects of recency of activation on recall of idea units and found, in addition to a significantly greater amount of recall of meaningful context idea units, that as time between sentence idea units and cue words increased, so did recall. Experiment 5 examined recency of activation in sentence pairs containing direct correspondence of content. The results indicated that when distractor tasks were employed during the time interval between the presentation of the sentences in pairs, no significant differences were observed in recall associated with differing intervals of time between presentation of the sentences in pairs. Experiment 6 examined the effects of context on retention within paragraph structures, and results showed that context influenced recall.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AUBLE, P. M., & FRANKS, J. J. (1978). The effects of effort toward comprehension on recall. Memory and Cognition, 6, 20–25.
AUBLE, P. M., FRANKS, J. J., & SORACI, S. A. (1979). Effort toward comprehension: Elaboration or“aha!”? Memory and Cognition, 7, 426–434.
BRANSFORD, J. D., & FRANKS, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331–350.
BRANSFORD, J. D., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.
BRANSFORD, J. D., & MCCARRELL, N. S. (1974). A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension. In W. WEIMER & D. PALERMO (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
GLOVER, J. A., BRUNING, R. H., & PLAKE, B. S. (1982). Distinctiveness of encoding and recall of text materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 522–534.
GOETZ, E. T., ANDERSON, R. C., & SCHALLERT, D. L. (1981). The representation of sentences in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 369–385.
HAYES-ROTH, B. (1977). Evolution of cognition structures and processes. Psychological Review, 84, 260–278.
HAYES-ROTH, B., & THORNDYKE, P. W. (1979). Integration of knowledge from text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 91–108.
HAYES-ROTH, B., & WALKER, C. (1979). Configurai effects in human memory. Cognitive Science, 3, 119–140.
HYDE, T. S., & JENKINS, J. J. (1969). Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a test of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 472–481.
JENKINS, J. J. (1974). Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it! American Psychologist, 29, 785–795.
KINTSCH, W. (1979). On modeling comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 14, 3–14.
KINTSCH, W., KOZMINSKY, E., STREBY, W. J., MCKOON, C., & KEENAN, J. M. (1975). Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 196–214.
MEYER, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effect on recall. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.
MEYER, B. J. F. (1981). Prose analysis: Procedures, purposes, and problems. (Prose Learning Series, Research Report No. 11). Tempe: Arizona State University.
MILLER, J. R., & KINTSCH, W. (1980). Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 335–354.
ROSS, B. A. (1981). The more the better?: Number of decisions as a determinant of memorability. Memory and Cognition, 9, 23–33.
WALSH, D. A., & JENKINS, J. J. (1973). Effects of orienting tasks on free recall in incidental learning:“Difficulty,”“effort,” and“process” explanations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 481–488.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monkowski, P.G., Glover, J.A. & Ronning, R.R. An Examination of Some Aspects of Knowledge-Assembly Theory. Psychol Rec 36, 185–202 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394940
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394940