Skip to main content
Log in

Memory and Memory Monitoring: Levels of Processing, Idea Unit Level, and Text Organization in the Retention of Prose

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Memory and memory monitoring processes were compared by introducing an idea unit ranking task to prose text adapted to depth of processing and text organization variables. Depth of processing was operationalized through fluency, concreteness, and category-relatedness instructions. Text organization was manipulated through matched-to-task, scrambled, and narrative sentence orderings. Proportion recalled (memory) and proportion estimated recall (memory monitoring) for each idea unit level comprised the primary dependent measures. Depth of processing and idea unit level were successfully extended to prose memory and were reflected in memory monitoring. Narrative organizations produced greater recall than either the matched or scrambled organizations. Organization, however, was not a salient factor in memory monitoring. Recalling passages provided additional information which increased the accuracy of monitoring estimations. Memory monitoring (estimation) patterns in general echoed those of memory (recall).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BADDELEY, A. D. (1978). The trouble with levels; A reexamination of Craik and Lockhart’s framework for memory research. Psychological Review, 85, 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BAKER, L. A. (1979). Comprehension monitoring: Identifying and coping with text confusions (Tech. Rep. No. 145). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLAKE, M. (1973). Prediction of recognition when recall fails: Exploring the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BLAKE, M. (1978). Human memory and the “feeling-of-knowing.” Dissertation Abstracts International, 38 (10-B), 5053–5054.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRANSFORD, J. D., & FRANKS, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, A. L. (1977). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition, (Tech. Rep. No. 47). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, A. L., & DELOACHE, J. S. (1977). Skills, plans, and self-regulation (Tech. Rep. No. 48). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, A. L., & SMILEY, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Envelopment, 48, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, R., & MCNEILL, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAVANAUGH, J. C., & BORKOWSKI, J. G. (1980). Searching for metamemory-memory connections: A developmental study. Developmental Psychology, 441-453.

  • CAVANAUGH, J. C., & PERLMUTTER, M. (1982). Metamemory: A critical examination. Child Development, 53, 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRAIK, F. I. M., & LOCKHART, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRAIK, F. I. M., & TULVING, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOOLING, J. & CHRISTI ANSEN, R. (1977). Levels of encoding and retention of prose. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLAVELL, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 24, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLAVELL, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARDINER, J. M., PASSMORE, C., HERRIOT, P., & KLEE, H. (1977). Memory for remembered events: Effects of response mode and response-produced feedback. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GARNHAM, A., OAKHILL, J., & JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1982). Referential continuity and the coherence of discourse. Cognition, 11, 29–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GOODMAN, C., & GARDINER, J. M. (1981). How well do children remember what they have recalled? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 97–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HART, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling of knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 208–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HART, J. T. (1967). Memory and the memory monitoring process. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 685–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYS, W. L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, R. E. (1970). Recall of prose as a function of the structural importance of the linguistic units. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KENISTON, A. H., & FLAVELL, J. H. (1979). A developmental study of intelligent retrieval. Child Development, 50, 1144–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KINTSCH, W., KIZMINSKY, E., STREBY, W. G., MCKOON, G., & KEENAN, J. M. (1975). Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 196–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KLEE, H., & GARDINER, J. M. (1981). Remembering the recall of cued and uncued words: Effects of initial accessibility. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 220–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LUFTIG, R. L. (1983). Abstractive memory, the central-incidental hypothesis and the use of structural importance in text: Control processes or structural features? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MANDLER, J. M., & GOODMAN, M. S. (1982). On the psychological validity of story structure. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MANDLER, J. M., & JOHNSON, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MARKMAN, E. J. (1981). Comprehension monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MISTLER-LACHMAN, J. L. (1974). Depth of comprehension and sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13. 98-106.

  • MISTLER-LACHMAN, J. L. (1975). Queer sentences, ambiguity, and levels of processing. Memory and Cognition, 3, 395–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NELSON, T. O. (1977). Repetition and depth of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PARIS, S. G. (1978, May). Metacognitive development: Children’s regulation of problem solving skills. Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, Il.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARIS, S. G., & CARTER, A. Y. (1973). Semantic and constructive aspects of sentence memory in children. Developmental Psychology, 9, 109–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRATT, M. W., LUSZCZ, M. A., MACKENZIE-KEATING, S., & MANNING, A. (1982). Thinking about stories: The story schema in metacognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHALLERT, D. E. (1976). Improving memory for prose: The relationship between depth of processing and context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 621–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHAUGHNESSY, J. J. (1981). Memory monitoring accuracy and modification of rehearsal strategies. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 216–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STEIN, N. L., & NEZWORSKI, T. (1978). The effects of organization and instructional set on story memory. Discourse Processes, 1, 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • THORNDYKE, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TIME MAGAZINE (1980a). Pioneers of the supergene. 1980, 116, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • TIME MAGAZINE (1980b). Riding the wind. 1980, 116, 78.

  • TIME MAGAZINE (1980c). Video venom. 1980, 116, 81.

  • WELLMAN, H. M. (1977). Tip of the tongue and feeling of knowing experiences: A developmental study of memory monitoring. Child Development, 48, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YUSSEN, S. R., & PAQUETTE, N. S. (1978). Developmental changes in predicting recognition memory for semantically related and unrelated sentences. Developmental Psychology, 13, 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is based on a disertation submitted to Kent State University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Surgent, E.A. Memory and Memory Monitoring: Levels of Processing, Idea Unit Level, and Text Organization in the Retention of Prose. Psychol Rec 35, 251–268 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394931

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394931

Navigation