Skip to main content
Log in

Regularity of Inescapable Shock Duration Affects Behavioral Topography, but not Shuttle Escape Performance

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One purpose of the present experiment was to investigate the effects of exposure to fixed and variable duration inescapable shock on the subsequent acquisition of a shuttle escape response. Another purpose was to examine closely the behavior of animals during exposure to inescapable shock in an attempt to assess directly the behavioral changes occurring during this experience. Competing response accounts of the learned helplessness effect propose the mechanism of adventitious reinforcement during inescapable shock for the learning of low activity responses. Exposure to inescapable fixed duration shock should therefore be more effective than variable duration shock of the same average value in producing subsequent escape deficits. However, the present experiment demonstrated equivalent shuttle escape deficits resulting from the two types of shock exposure. In addition, behavioral observations made during inescapable shock indicated that those behaviors immediately preceding shock offset during the first several trials were not more likely to develop than other behaviors that were virtually absent early in the session. This pattern of results does not support current competing response hypotheses, but is in agreement with learned helplessness theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALTENOR, A., VOLPICELO, J. R., & SELIGMAN, M. E. P. (1979). Debilitated shock escape is produced by both short and long-duration inescapable shock: Learned helplessness vs. learned inactivity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 337–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANISMAN, H. (1975). Time-dependent variations in aversively motivated behaviors: Nonassociative effects of cholinergic and catecholaminergic activity. Psychological Review, 82, 359–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ANISMAN, H., DECATANZARO, D., & REMINGTON, G. (1978). Escape performance deficits following exposure to inescapable shock: Deficits in motor response maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOLLES, R. C. (1970). Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychological Review, 71, 32–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRACEWELL, R. J., & BLACK, A. H. (1974). The effects of restraint and noncontingent preshock on subsequent escape learning in the rat. Learning and Motivation, 5, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DRUGAN, R. C., & MAIER, S. F. (1982). The nature of the activity deficit produced by inescapable shock. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 401–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GLAZER, H. I., & WEISS, J. M. (1976a). Long-term and transitory interference effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLAZER, H. I., & WEISS, J. M. (1976b). Long-term interference effect: An alternative to “Learned Helplessness.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior frocesses, 2, 202–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • KELSEY, J. E. (1977). Escape acquisition following inescapable shock in the rat. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEVIS, D. J. (1976). Learned helplessness: A reply and alternative S-R interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAIER, S. F., ALBIN, R. W., & TESTA, T. J. (1973). Failure to learn to escape in rats previously exposed to inescapable shock depends on the nature of the escape response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 85, 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAIER, S. F., & JACKSON, R. L. (1979). Learned helplessness: All of us were right (and wrong): Inescapable shock has multiple effects. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 155–218). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAIER, S. F., & SELIGMAN, M. E. P. (1976). Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 3–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OVERMIER, J. B., & SELIGMAN, M. E. P. (1967). Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 63, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OVERMIER, J. B., & WIELKIEWICZ, R. M. (1983). On unpredictability as a causal factor in “Learned helplessness.” Learning and Motivation, 14, 324–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SELIGMAN, M. E. P., & BEAGLEY, G. (1975). Learned helplessness in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 88, 534–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SELIGMAN, M. E. P., MAIER, S. F., & SOLOMON, R. L. (1971). Unpredictable and uncontrollable aversive events. In F. R. Brush (Ed.), Aversive conditioning and learning (pp. 347–401). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • VOLPICELLI, J. R., ULM, R. R., ALTENOR, A., & SELIGMAN, M. E. P. (1983). Learned mastery in the rat. Learning and Motivation, 14, 204–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEISS, J. M., GLAZER, H. I., & POHORECKY, L. A. (1976). Coping behavior and neurochemical changes: An alternative explanation for the original “learned helplessness” experiments. In Relevance of the psychopathological animal model to the human (pp. 141–173). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warren, D.A., Rosellini, R.A. & Plonsky, M. Regularity of Inescapable Shock Duration Affects Behavioral Topography, but not Shuttle Escape Performance. Psychol Rec 35, 227–238 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394929

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394929

Navigation