Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical Plurality and Unity in Psychology

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question of unity and diversity in science and psychology is a question that seems to resist final solution. Part of the problem is that the analysis is usually not pushed to the level where the ambiguity of the meaning of unity shows up. Unity can mean “singleness” in the sense of absence of difference or “singleness” in the sense of integrating diverse parts under one idea (concinnity). When scientists object to unity in science or psychology they imply “absence of difference” and when scientists argue for it they imply unity in the sense of concinnity. Thus the two senses of unity can be rendered compatible and the position is taken that unity in the sense of concinnity is desired and necessary for psychology to be a mature science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • DIXON, Roger A. (1983). Theoretical proliferation in psychology: A plea for sustained disunity. The Psychological Record, 33, 337–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1983). System analysis in science and in psychology. The Psychological Record, 33, 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1984). Scientific unity and spiritistic disunity. The Psychological Record, 34, 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOCH, S. (1976). Language communities, search cells, and the psychological studies. In J. K. Cole & W. J. Arnold (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 23. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEARY, DAVID. (1983). On scientific morality. American Psychologist, 38, 12–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OBSERVER. (1971). Disunity in science: Inconcinnity in psychology. The Psychological Record, 21, 565–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OBSERVER. (1982). Unity and disunity in science and in psychology. The Psychological Record, 32, 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged. (1976). Springfield, Ma: G. & C. Merriam Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giorgi, A. Theoretical Plurality and Unity in Psychology. Psychol Rec 35, 177–181 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394923

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394923

Navigation