Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Reward Magnitude on Key Pecking and Eating by Pigeons in a Closed Economy

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three experiments examined the effects of reward magnitude on key pecking and eating by pigeons in a closed economy. In Experiment 1, one deprived pigeon and two nondeprived pigeons key pecked on increasingly higher fixed ratios to earn access to food for the remainder of the session. In Experiments 2 and 3, deprived pigeons working in a closed economy key pecked on either six fixed-ratio or two variable-interval schedules to earn access to one of three short durations of feeding. All pigeons initially key pecked more frequently as the ratio (or interval) size increased or reward magnitude decreased. In Experiments 1 and 2, the point of maximum key pecking varied directly with magnitude of reward and occurred at similar prices (number of key pecks per gram of food eaten). Key pecking on interval schedules also varied inversely with reward magnitude; however, maximum key pecking was sustained over a wider range of prices. The implications of these results for economic models and regulatory models of learned performance and the concept of ratio strain in a closed economy are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CATANIA, A. C. (1963). Concurrent performances: A baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 299–300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • COLLIER, G., HIRSCH, E., & KANAREK, R. (1977). The operant revisited. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLLIER, G. H., & ROVEE-COLLIER, C. K. (1981). A comparative analysis of optimal foraging behavior: Laboratory simulations. In A. C. Kamil & T. D. Sargent (Eds.)., Foraging behavior: Ecological, ethological, and psychological approaches. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • FERNIE, R. W. (1971). A device for measuring food-magazine behavior in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 409–410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • HANSON, S. J., & TIMBERLAKE, W. (1983). Regulation during challenge: A general model of learned performance under schedule constraint. Psychological Review, 90, 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HODOS, W., & KALMAN, G. (1963). Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 387–392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HOGAN, J. A., & ROPER, T. J. (1978). A comparison of the properties of different reinforcers. In J. S. Rosenblatt, R. A. Hinde, C. Beer, & M.-C. Busnel (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HURSH, S. R. (1978). The economics of daily consumption controlling food- and water-reinforced responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 475–491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HURSH, S. R. (1980). Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 219–238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • JENKINS, W. O., & CLAYTON, F. L. (1949). Rate of responding and amount of reinforcement. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 42, 174–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KEESEY, R. E., & KLING, J. W. (1961). Amount of reinforcement and free-operant responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 125–132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KREBS, J. R. (1978). Optimal foraging: Decision rules for predators. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOGAN, F. A. (1960). Incentive: How the conditions of reinforcement affect the performance of rats. New Haven, CT: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOGAN, F. A. (1964). The free behavior situation. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium of Motivation (Vol. 12). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUCAS, G. A. (1981). Some effects of reinforcer availability on the pigeon’s responding in 24-hour sessions. Animal Learning & Behavior, 9, 411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MORAN, G. (1975). Severe food deprivation: Some thoughts regarding its exclusive use. Psycholog-ical Bulletin, 82, 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • POWELL, R. W. (1969). The effect of reinforcement magnitude upon responding under fixed-ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 605–608.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • REESE, T. W., & HOGENSON, M. J. (1962). Food satiation in the pigeon. Journal of the Experi-mental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & STEBBINS, W. C. (1954). Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of rein-forcement. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 114–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • STADDON, J. E. R. (1979). Operant behavior as adaptation to constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 46–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • TIMBERLAKE, W. (1977). The application of the matching law to simple ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 215–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TIMBERLAKE, W. (1980). A molar equilibrium theory of learned performance. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 14). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by National Institute of Mental Health Grant No. Mh-19300 to Eliot Hearst and Nsf Grant No. Bns 79-15117 to William Timberlake; James Dinsmoor and George Heise also provided laboratory space and equipment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peden, B.F., Timberlake, W. Effects of Reward Magnitude on Key Pecking and Eating by Pigeons in a Closed Economy. Psychol Rec 34, 397–415 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394883

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394883

Navigation