Skip to main content
Log in

Social Schemata of Israeli Children on Measures of Distance and Height in Dyad and Family Placements

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main research objectives were (a) to study the social schemata of children on two measures: distance between figures and differences between heights of figures, the latter measure has not been previously studied; (b) to compare two types of placements, dyad vs. family placements, a parameter not previously attended to. A modified version of Kuethe’s technique was employed. Twelve figures were employed, six male and six female, designed to depict adults and children. Each of the participants, 63 boys and 64 girls, 5th graders, was instructed to place himself/herself, a father figure, a mother figure, and all three figures, three separate placements in all, on a sheet of paper measuring 80 × 42 cm. The child was free to choose one of three figures, each differing in height for both child and adult figures. Results confirmed the hypothesis that there are differences between dyad and family placements both as regards distance and height. Sex differences were also noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • DUHAMEL, T. R., & JARMON, H. (1971). Social schemas of emotionally disturbed boys and their male siblings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ELDAN, Z. (1976). Size and distance in social schemata as a measure of family relations. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Israel. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • FISHER, R. (1967). Social schema of normal and disturbed school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 88–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GERBER, G. L., & KASWAN, J. (1971). Expression of emotion through family grouping schemata, distance, and interpersonal focus. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 370–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUARDO, C. J. (1969). Personal space in children. Child Development, 40, 141–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HIGGINS, J., PETERSON, J. C, & DOLBY, L. L. (1969). Social adjustment and familial schema. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 296–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HOBBS, N. (1966). Helping disturbed children: Psychological and ecological strategies. American Psychologist, 21, 1105–1115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HOROWITZ, M. J., DUFF, D. F., & STRATTON, L. D. (1970). Personal space and the body buffer zone. In H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittleson, & L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLOPFER, F. J., JACKSON, T. T., WOLFE, W. G., & JEFFREY, G. S. (1977). The felt figure replacement technique as a personality assessment device: Validity reconsidered. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 392–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KUETHE, J. L. (1962). Social schemas. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 31–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KUETHE, J. L., & STRICKER, G. (1963). Man and woman: Social schemata of males and females. Psychological Reports, 13, 655–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’BRIEN, R. P., & PATTON, W. F. (1974). Development of an objective scoring method for the kinetic family drawing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 156–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RABINOWITZ, A., & SHAVIT, H. (1977), Social schemata of children, peer acceptance, and home or dormitory residence. Psychological Reports, 41, 1075–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REZNIKOFF, M., & REZNIKOFF, H. R. (1956). The family drawing test: A comparative study of children’s drawings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12, 167–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • STEER, R. A., THORNTON, C. C., & RITTING, C. A. (1974). Validity of the felt figure techniques: A factor analytic approach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 255–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • TOLOR, A. (1968). Psychological distance in disturbed and normal children. Psychological Reports, 23, 695–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • TOLOR, A., CRAMER, M., D’AMICO, D., & O’MARRA, M. M. (1975). The effects of self-concept, trust, and imagined positive or negative self-disclosures on psychological space. Journal of Psychology, 89, 9–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • TOLOR, A., WARREN, M., & WEINICK, H. M. (1971). Relation between parental impersonal styles and their children’s psychological distance. Psychological Reports, 29, 1263–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEINSTEIN, L. (1965). Social schemata of emotionally disturbed boys. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 70, 457–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEINSTEIN, L. (1967). Social experience and social schemata. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 429–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rabinowitz, A., Eldan, Z. Social Schemata of Israeli Children on Measures of Distance and Height in Dyad and Family Placements. Psychol Rec 34, 343–351 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394878

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394878

Navigation