Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Command Preexposure on Instruction-Following Behavior in Severely Retarded Adolescents

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Repeated nonreinforced preexposure of a stimulus subsequently used as a conditioned or discriminative stimulus typically results in a decrement in performance of infrahumans and humans in classical and instrumental conditioning tasks. The naturalistic or applied significance of this “latent inhibition” phenomenon has not been investigated. This study examined the effects of repeated presentations of verbal commands on the acquisition of instruction-following behavior in two severely retarded girls. Each received 200 preexposures of one command followed by instruction-following training on both the preexposed and a nonpreexposed command. This procedure was repeated for three different pairs of commands for each girl. Commands were given in French and preexposed and nonpreexposed commands were counterbalanced across subjects. Mean percentage of unassisted responses to preexposed commands was 35.9 percentage points less than to nonpreexposed commands on the first day of training. The results suggest that latent inhibition may be a viable phenomenon in applied settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MARKMAN, R., & LUBOW, R.E. Latent inhibition of the pinna response of the albino rabbit as a function of time of delay between pre-exposure and conditioning. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, October 1965.

    Book  Google Scholar 

References

  • ACKIL, J.E., & MELLGREN, R.L. 1968. Stimulus preexposure and instrumental learning. Psychonomic Science, 11, 339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CANTOR, G.N. 1969. Stimulus familiarization effect and the change effect in children’s motor task behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 144–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CANTOR, G.N., & CANTOR, J.H. 1964. Effects of conditioned-stimulus familiarization on instrumental learning in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1, 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CANTOR, G.N., & CANTOR, J.H. 1966. Discriminative reaction time in children as related to amount of stimulus familiarization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 4, 150–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DEHAVEN, E. 1981. Teaching three severely retarded children to follow instructions. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 16, 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • FELDMAN, M.A. 1977. The effects of preexposure to a warning or a safety signal on the acquisition of a two-way avoidance response in rats. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5, 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GINTON, A., URCA, G., & LUBOW, R.E. 1975. The effects of preexposure to a nonat-tended stimulus on subsequent learning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HALGREN, C.R. 1974. Latent inhibition in rats: Associative or nonassociative. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 74–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IVY, R., & DUBIN, W. 1979. Acquisition and generalization of instruction following behavior in profoundly retarded individuals. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 163–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KALAT, J.W., & ROZIN, P. 1973. “Learned safety” as a mechanism in long-delay taste aversion learning in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 83, 198–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KAZDIN, A.E., & ERRICKSON, L.M. 1975. Developing responsiveness to instructions in severely and profoundly retarded residents. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 6, 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LUBOW, R.E. 1973. Latent inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 398–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LUBOW, R.E., ALEK, M., & ARZY, J. 1975. Behavioral decrement following stimulus preexposure: Effects of number of preexposures, presence of a second stimulus and interstimulus interval in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 178–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LUBOW, R.E., & MOORE, A.U. 1959. Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced preexposure to the conditional stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 416–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LUBOW, R.E., RIFKIN, B., & ALEK, M. 1976. The context effect: The relationship between stimulus preexposure and environmental preexposure determines subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LUBOW, R.E., SCHNUR, P., & RIFKIN, B. 1976. Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N.J. 1973. Stimulus selection: Learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. In R.A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.). Constraints on learning. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PAVLOV, L.P. 1927. Conditioned reflexes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHNUR, P., & KSIR, C.J. 1969. Latent inhibition in human eyelid conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 388–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SIEGEL, S. 1969a. Effect of Cs habituation on eyelid conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 68, 245–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SIEGEL, S. 1969b. Generalization of latent inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 69, 157–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIEGEL, S. 1974. Flavor preexposure and “learned safety”. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 87, 1073–1082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B.F. 1953. Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • STRIEFEL, S., BRYAN, K., & AIKINS, O. 1974. Transfer of stimulus control from motor to verbal stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 123–135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • STRIEFEL, S., & WHETHERBY, B. 1973. Instruction-following behavior of a retarded child and its controlling stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 663–670.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • WHITMAN, T.L., ZAKARAS, M., & CHARDOS, S. 1971. Effects of reinforcement and guidance procedures on instruction-following behavior of severely retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 283–290.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Behavior Research Program, Surrey Place Centre, 2 Surrey Place, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2C2

    Maurice A. Feldman

Authors
  1. Maurice A. Feldman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was conducted at Southwestern Regional Centre, Blenheim, Ontario and was previously reported at the Association for Behavior Analysis, Annual Convention, Dearborn, Michigan, May 1979. The author thanks C. Burke for her assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feldman, M.A. The Effect of Command Preexposure on Instruction-Following Behavior in Severely Retarded Adolescents. Psychol Rec 32, 529–535 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394811

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394811

Search

Navigation