Abstract
An appropriate and effective means of repelling nuisance bears is currently not available to recreation area personnel. Those methods which have been employed with limited success in other settings would be disruptive to campground and picnic area users.
By applying long-established behavioral technology which is used extensively by other disciplines, new methods can readily be developed to coerce a bear to leave an area where it is not wanted. This case study demonstrates that a nuisance bear can be trained by classical conditioning procedures to associate an unobtrusive, ultrasonic tone with the aversive sound of a loud horn. This learned association was accomplished by repeated presentation of both stimuli to the animal while confined in a culvert trap.
A postconditioning test demonstrated that the previously neutral sound, inaudible to humans, was capable of immediately prompting the bear to leave a well-baited campsite. The bear’s behavior further indicated that the conditioned stimulus did not elicit the startle, fear, or flight responses which normally would result from direct use of the horn. Only the accompanying autonomic responses became conditioned to the ultrasonic tone; apparently overt behaviors were thwarted by confinement in the trap, precluding their being conditioned as well. Nevertheless, the uncomfortable or disturbing autonomic responses were triggered by presentation of the ultrasonic tone, presumably causing the bear to feel ill at ease in the situation and to leave in a deliberate, determined manner.
This example of stimulus control of a bear’s behavior illustrates the pragmatic potential of behavioral technology in the management of nuisance bears and lays the groundwork for further exploration of this potential.
Current continuation of this research employs the sight and sound of humans as conditioned stimuli; this direct approach attempts to restore a nuisance bear’s “natural fear of humans.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
WOOLDRIDGE, D.R., & GILBERT, B.K. 1979. Polar bear detection and deterrent systems. Report to Fish and Wildlife Department, Government of Northwest Territories. Burnaby, British Columbia: Wooldridge Biological Consulting.
MILLER, G. 1980. Responses to grizzly and polar bears to controlled repellent tests. Paper presented at Fifth International Conference on Bear Research and Management. Madison, Wisconsin.
MILLER, G. 1979. Personal correspondence (University of Montana).
WOOLDRIDGE, D.R. 1979. Personal correspondence (Wooldridge Biological Consulting).
ANDERSON, T.E. 1971. Identifying, evaluating, and controlling wildlife damage. In R. H. Giles, Jr. (Ed.). Wildlife management techniques. Washington: The Wildlife Society.
BAPTISTE, M.E., WHELAN, J.B., & FRARY, R.B. 1979. Visitor perception of black bear problems at Shenandoah National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 1(1):25–29.
COWAN, I.M. 1972. The status and conservation of bears of the world–1970. In S. Herrero (Ed.). Bears–their biology and management. New Serie 23. Morges: Iucn.
FRINGS, H. 1964. Sound in vertebrate pest control. Proceedings Vertebrate Pest Control Conference, 2:50–56.
GREENE, R.J., HOATS, D.L., & DIBBLE, W.A., JR. 1975. Generalization of the aversive effect of music distortion. The Psychological Record, 25:173–180.
HEFFNER, R., & HEFFNER, H. 1980. Hearing in the elephant (Elephas maximus). Science, 208:518–520.
HERRERO, S. 1976. Conflicts between man and grizzly in the national parks of North America. In M.R. Pelton, J.W. Lentfer, & G.E. Folk, Jr. (Eds.). Bears–their biology and management. New Serie. 40. Morges: Iucn.
HILGARD, E.R., & BOWER, G.H. 1966. Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
JORDAN, R.H. 1976. Threat behavior of the black bear. In M.R. Pelton, J.W. Lentfer, & G.E. Folk, Jr. (Eds.). Bears–their biology and management. New Serie. 40. Morges: Iucn.
LaVOIE, G.K., & GLAHN, J.F. 1977. Ultrasound as a deterrent to Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Stored Products Research, 13:23–28.
PELTON, M.R., SCOTT, C.D., & BURGHARDT, G.M. 1976. Attitudes and opinions of persons experiencing property damage and/or injury by black bears in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. In M.R. Pelton, J.W. Lentfer, & G.E. Folk, Jr. (Eds.). Bears–their biology and management. New Serie. 40. Morges: Iucn.
PETERSON, E.A., HESTON, W.C., & WRUBLE, S. 1976. Levels of auditory response in fissipede carnivores. Journal of Mammalogy, 50:566–578.
PUMPHREY, R.J. 1950. Upper limit of frequency for human hearing. Nature, 166:571.
STEWART, J.L. 1974. Experiments with sounds in repelling mammals. Proceedings Ver-tabrate Pest Control Conference, 6:222–226.
WOOLDRIDGE, D.R., & BELTON, P. 1977. Natural and synthesized sounds as polar bear repellents. In C.J. Martinka & K.L. McArthur (Eds.). Bears–their biology and management. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author thanks David L. Hoats for technical assistance with both design and instrumentation, as well as many individuals representing the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Colorado State University, the Denver Zoo, the National Forest Service, and the National Park Service who have provided essential support and assistance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greene, R.J. An Application of Behavioral Technology to the Problem of Nuisance Bears. Psychol Rec 32, 501–511 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394808
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394808