Skip to main content
Log in

An Application of Behavioral Technology to the Problem of Nuisance Bears

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An appropriate and effective means of repelling nuisance bears is currently not available to recreation area personnel. Those methods which have been employed with limited success in other settings would be disruptive to campground and picnic area users.

By applying long-established behavioral technology which is used extensively by other disciplines, new methods can readily be developed to coerce a bear to leave an area where it is not wanted. This case study demonstrates that a nuisance bear can be trained by classical conditioning procedures to associate an unobtrusive, ultrasonic tone with the aversive sound of a loud horn. This learned association was accomplished by repeated presentation of both stimuli to the animal while confined in a culvert trap.

A postconditioning test demonstrated that the previously neutral sound, inaudible to humans, was capable of immediately prompting the bear to leave a well-baited campsite. The bear’s behavior further indicated that the conditioned stimulus did not elicit the startle, fear, or flight responses which normally would result from direct use of the horn. Only the accompanying autonomic responses became conditioned to the ultrasonic tone; apparently overt behaviors were thwarted by confinement in the trap, precluding their being conditioned as well. Nevertheless, the uncomfortable or disturbing autonomic responses were triggered by presentation of the ultrasonic tone, presumably causing the bear to feel ill at ease in the situation and to leave in a deliberate, determined manner.

This example of stimulus control of a bear’s behavior illustrates the pragmatic potential of behavioral technology in the management of nuisance bears and lays the groundwork for further exploration of this potential.

Current continuation of this research employs the sight and sound of humans as conditioned stimuli; this direct approach attempts to restore a nuisance bear’s “natural fear of humans.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • WOOLDRIDGE, D.R., & GILBERT, B.K. 1979. Polar bear detection and deterrent systems. Report to Fish and Wildlife Department, Government of Northwest Territories. Burnaby, British Columbia: Wooldridge Biological Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, G. 1980. Responses to grizzly and polar bears to controlled repellent tests. Paper presented at Fifth International Conference on Bear Research and Management. Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, G. 1979. Personal correspondence (University of Montana).

    Google Scholar 

  • WOOLDRIDGE, D.R. 1979. Personal correspondence (Wooldridge Biological Consulting).

    Google Scholar 

  • ANDERSON, T.E. 1971. Identifying, evaluating, and controlling wildlife damage. In R. H. Giles, Jr. (Ed.). Wildlife management techniques. Washington: The Wildlife Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • BAPTISTE, M.E., WHELAN, J.B., & FRARY, R.B. 1979. Visitor perception of black bear problems at Shenandoah National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 1(1):25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • COWAN, I.M. 1972. The status and conservation of bears of the world–1970. In S. Herrero (Ed.). Bears–their biology and management. New Serie 23. Morges: Iucn.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRINGS, H. 1964. Sound in vertebrate pest control. Proceedings Vertebrate Pest Control Conference, 2:50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREENE, R.J., HOATS, D.L., & DIBBLE, W.A., JR. 1975. Generalization of the aversive effect of music distortion. The Psychological Record, 25:173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEFFNER, R., & HEFFNER, H. 1980. Hearing in the elephant (Elephas maximus). Science, 208:518–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HERRERO, S. 1976. Conflicts between man and grizzly in the national parks of North America. In M.R. Pelton, J.W. Lentfer, & G.E. Folk, Jr. (Eds.). Bears–their biology and management. New Serie. 40. Morges: Iucn.

    Google Scholar 

  • HILGARD, E.R., & BOWER, G.H. 1966. Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • JORDAN, R.H. 1976. Threat behavior of the black bear. In M.R. Pelton, J.W. Lentfer, & G.E. Folk, Jr. (Eds.). Bears–their biology and management. New Serie. 40. Morges: Iucn.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaVOIE, G.K., & GLAHN, J.F. 1977. Ultrasound as a deterrent to Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Stored Products Research, 13:23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PELTON, M.R., SCOTT, C.D., & BURGHARDT, G.M. 1976. Attitudes and opinions of persons experiencing property damage and/or injury by black bears in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. In M.R. Pelton, J.W. Lentfer, & G.E. Folk, Jr. (Eds.). Bears–their biology and management. New Serie. 40. Morges: Iucn.

    Google Scholar 

  • PETERSON, E.A., HESTON, W.C., & WRUBLE, S. 1976. Levels of auditory response in fissipede carnivores. Journal of Mammalogy, 50:566–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PUMPHREY, R.J. 1950. Upper limit of frequency for human hearing. Nature, 166:571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, J.L. 1974. Experiments with sounds in repelling mammals. Proceedings Ver-tabrate Pest Control Conference, 6:222–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOOLDRIDGE, D.R., & BELTON, P. 1977. Natural and synthesized sounds as polar bear repellents. In C.J. Martinka & K.L. McArthur (Eds.). Bears–their biology and management. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author thanks David L. Hoats for technical assistance with both design and instrumentation, as well as many individuals representing the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Colorado State University, the Denver Zoo, the National Forest Service, and the National Park Service who have provided essential support and assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greene, R.J. An Application of Behavioral Technology to the Problem of Nuisance Bears. Psychol Rec 32, 501–511 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394808

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394808

Navigation