Skip to main content
Log in

The Resistance to Reinforcement Technique for Measuring Inhibition

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This experiment investigated use of the resistance to reinforcement procedure to measure the inhibitory properties of a negative discriminative stimulus (S-) following discrimination training. One group of rats initially learned a problem with Cue Light 1 as the positive discriminative stimulus (S + ) and Cue Light 2 as S-; a second group had equal training with house light on as S + and dark as S-. During subsequent testing both groups were reinforced for responding to both dark and Cue Light 2. Thus, inhibitory properties of each S- could be evaluated by both within- and between-subject comparisons, with responding to a novel stimulus as the baseline in both cases. Between- and within-subject comparisons corresponded perfectly with both showing the dark S- to be a strong inhibitor, but neither showing the Cue Light 2 S- to have inhibitory properties. A possible explanation of the latter result is that discrimination learning involves two stages. In the first, excitatory properties of S- are lost, and only then does further training result in the development of true inhibition. The light-dark problem was learned quickly, and training continued well beyond the point where responding to S-was very low. Thus, it is not surprising that strong inhibition was demonstrated. With the more difficult problem, subjects achieved good discrimination performance only near the end of training and responding to S- was still relatively high. Thus, training may not have been sufficient to get beyond the stage of reducing excitation and into the development of true inhibition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • FARTHING, G.W., & HEARST, E. 1968. Generalization gradients of inhibition after different amounts of training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 743–752.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FRIEMAN, J., & GOYETTE, C.H. 1973. Transfer of training across stimulus modality and response class. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 235–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GUTMAN, A. 1977. Positive contrast, negative induction, and inhibitory stimulus control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 219–233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HEARST, E. 1971. Contrast and stimulus generalization following prolonged discrimination training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 355–363.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HEARST, E., BESLEY, S., & FARTHING, G.W. 1970. Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 373–409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KARPICKE, J., & HEARST, E. 1975. Inhibitory control and errorless learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 23, 159–166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • RESCORLA, R.A. 1969. Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RILLING, M. 1977. Stimulus control and inhibitory processes. In W.K. Honig & J.E.R. Staddon (Eds.). Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • RILLING, M., CAPLAN, H.J., HOWARD, R.C., & BROWN, C.H. 1975. Inhibitory stimulus control following errorless discrimination learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 21–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SELEKMAN, W. 1973. Behavioral contrast and inhibitory stimulus control as related to extended training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 245–252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B.F. 1938. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOMIE, A., & KRUSE, J. 1980. Retardation tests of inhibition following discriminative autoshaping. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMSON, D.A., LEEMING, F.C., SEWELL, W.R., & ROBINSON, K.D. 1979. The detection of inhibition using the resistance to reinforcement method. The Psychological Record, 29, 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • YARCZOWER, M., & CURTO, K. 1972. Stimulus control in pigeons after extended discrimination training. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 80, 484–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T., COLLINGS, N., & HEARST, E. 1971. Generalization gradients around a formerly positive S-. Psychonomic Science, 22, 257–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leeming, F.C. The Resistance to Reinforcement Technique for Measuring Inhibition. Psychol Rec 32, 435–444 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394800

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394800

Navigation