Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple Schedules of Escape and Their Effects on Avoidance

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four rats were trained to escape electric shock by satisfying various negative reinforcement schedules. The schedules employed included continuous escape, fixed interval (FI), differential reinforcement of low rate (DRL), differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO), and tandem fixed interval differential reinforcement of high rate 4 escape (tandem FI DRH 4 escape). Various combinations of these escape schedules, accompanied by discrete auditory and visual cues were alternated at 10-min intervals in a multiple schedule format. Each escape schedule was linked with a 20-sec avoidance component (R-S = 20 sec), in which responses prevented the occurrence of escape periods. In general, all rats produced the high or low escape rates expected from the escape schedules employed. The data produced during the shock off intervals revealed that avoidance was higher in conjunction with the fixed interval and DRL escape schedules relative to the avoidance produced when the continuous and DRO escape schedules were employed. The differential escape rates, in conjunction with the differential avoidance performances, indicated evidence of stimulus control by the various cues associated with the various escape-avoidance components employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Note

  1. SELEKMAN, W.S., SABBA, M., KENDALL, E., & HARBECK, A. Dro shock-escape disrupts lever press shock-avoidance. Presented at the Eastern Psychological Association Convention, Washington, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. ANGER, D. 1963. The role of temporal discrimination in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 447–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. AZRIN, N.H., HOLZ, W.C., HAKE, D.G., & AYLLON, T. 1963. Fixed ratio escape reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 449–456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. BOLLES, R.C. 1971. Species-specific defense reaction. In F.R. Brush (Ed.), Aversive conditioning and learning. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BOLLES, R.C, & POPP, R.J. 1974. Parameters affecting the acquisition of Sidman avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. BOLLES, R.C, STOKES, L.W., & YOUNGER, M.S. 1966. Does Cs termination reinforce avoidance behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 62, 201–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. BOROCZI, G., STORMS, L.H., & BROEN, W.E. 1967. Response suppression and recovery at different deprivation levels as functions of intensity and duration of punishment. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 63, 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. CHURCH, R.M., RAYMOND, G.A., & BEAUCHAMP, R.D. 1967. Response suppression as a function of intensity and duration of punishment. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psych ology, 63, 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. COHEN, P.S. 1970. DRL escape: Effects of minimum duration and intensity of electric shock. Journal of the Experimental A nalysis of Behavior, 13, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D’AMATO, M.R., & SCHIFF, D. 1964. Long term discriminated avoidance training. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 57, 123–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DINSMOOR, J.A. 1954. Punishment I: The avoidance hypotheses. Psychological Review, 61(1), 34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DINSMOOR, J.A. 1968. Escape from shock as a conditioning technique. In M. Jones, Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior 1967: Aversive Stimulation. Coral Gables, Florida: University of Miami Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. FERSTER, C.B., & SKINNER, B.F. Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

  13. GOLDSTEIN, M.L. 1960. Acquired drive strength as a joint function of shock intensity and number of acquisition trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 349–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. GRAEFE, J., & PISACRETA, R. 1977. An integrated circuit shock scrambler. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9(6), 499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. HERRNSTEIN, R.J. 1969. Method and theory in the study of avoidance. Psychological Review, 76, 49–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. HERRNSTEIN, R.J., & HINELINE, P.N. 1966. Negative reinforcement as shock frequency reduction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 421–430.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. HINELINE, P.N., & RACHLIN, H. 1969. Escape and avoidance of shocks by pigeons pecking a key. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 533–538.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. HURWITZ, H.M.B. 1964. Method for discriminated avoidance training. Science, 145, 1070–1071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. KAMIN, L. 1957. The gradient of delay of secondary reward in avoidance learning tested on avoidance trials only. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 50, 450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. LAMBERT, J.V., BERSH, P.J., HINELINE, T.N., & SMITH G. 1973. Avoidance conditioning with shock contingent upon the response. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 19, 361–368.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. LEAF, R.C. 1965. Acquisition of Sidman avoidance responding as a function of S-S interval. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 59, 298–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. MARTIN, R.C, & HECKEL, R.V. 1965. Fixed ratio escape performance with a wheel bar, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8, 71–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. MCALLISTER, W.R., & MCALLISTER, D.E. 1962. Post conditioning delay and intensity of shock as factors in the measurement of acquired fear. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 110–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. MEYER, D.R., CHO, C., & WESEMAN, A.F. 1960. On problems of conditioning discriminated lever-press avoidance responses. Psychological Review, 67, 224–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. MORSE, W.H., & KELLEHER, R.T. 1966. Schedules using noxious stimuli. I. Multiple fixed ratio and fixed-interval termination of schedule complexes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9(3), 267–290.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. MOWRER, O.H. 1947. On the dual nature of learning: A reinterpretation of conditioning and problem solving. Harvard Educational Review, 17, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  27. PISACRETA, R. 1980. Intermittent escape schedules and their effect on avoidance. The Psychological Record, 30, 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  28. REYNOLDS, G.S. 1961a. Behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 51–11.

    Google Scholar 

  29. REYNOLDS, G.S. 1961b. An analysis of interactions in a multiple schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 107–117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. REYNOLDS, G.S. 1961c. Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4(2), 179–184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. REYNOLDS, G.S. 1961d. Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4(4), 289–294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. SCHOENFELD, W.N. 1969. “Avoidance” in behavior theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 669–674.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. SIDMAN, M. 1953. Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior in the white rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 46, 253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. SIDMAN, M. 1962a. Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning stimulus. Science, 5, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  35. SIDMAN, M. 1962b. Reduction of shock frequency as reinforcement for avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 247–257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. SOLOMON, R., & WYNNE, L. 1954. Traumatic avoidance learning. Psychological Review, 61(6), 353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. STORMS, L.H., BOROCZI, G., & BROEN, W.E. 1965. Recovery from punishment of bar pressing maintained on fixed and variable interval reward schedules. Psychonomic Science, 3, 289–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. WEISMANN, A. 1962. Non-discriminated avoidance behavior in a large sample of rats. Psychological Reports, 10, 591–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. WINOGRAD, E. 1965. Escape behavior under different fixed ratios and shock intensities. Journal of the Experimental A nalysis of Behavior, 8, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. ZEILER, M.D. 1971. Eliminating behavior with reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 401–406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pisacreta, R. Multiple Schedules of Escape and Their Effects on Avoidance. Psychol Rec 31, 237–253 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394737

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394737

Navigation