Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Decrement Following Shock Preexposure: The Effect of Number and Duration of Escapable and Inescapable Shocks

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experiments, using mice, investigated the effects of preexposure to shock on subsequent bar-press-to-escape performance. Experiment 1 demonstrated the usual interference effect: Subjects exposed to escapable shock performed better than subjects exposed to no shock, who in turn performed better than those exposed to inescapable shock. In Experiment 2, a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design compared groups that were preexposed to escapable or inescapable shock of 2- or 6-sec duration for either 60 or 180 trials. An interaction between number and duration of inescapable shocks was shown, such that it was possible to produce an interference effect with short duration shocks when a large number of preexposures was employed. This finding is congruent with a number of hypotheses which attempt to account for such interference effects, but is difficult to reconcile with simple motor inactivity or uncontrollability interpretations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Note

  1. LUBOW, R.E., ROSENBLATT, R., & WEINER, I. The confounding controllability in the triadic design for demonstrating learned helplessness. Unpublished manuscript, 1979. Available from authors.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. ALTENOR, A., VOLPICELLI, J.R., & SELIGMAN, M.E.P. 1979. Debilitated shock escape is produced by both short- and long-duration inescapable shock: Learned helplessness vs. learned inactivity. Bulletin ofthe Psychonomic Society, 14, 337–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ANISMAN, H., deCATANZARO, I., & REMINGTON, G. 1978. Escape performance following exposure to inescapable shock: Deficits in motor-response maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ANISMAN, H., GRIMMER, L., IRWIN, J., REMINGTON, G., & SKLAR, L.S. 1979. Escape performance after inescapable shock in selectively bred lines of mice: Response maintenance and catecholamine activity. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 93, 229–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. BAKER, A.G. 1976. Learned irrelevance and learned helplessness: Rats learn that stimuli, reinforcers and responses are uncorrelated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

  5. BRACEWELL, R.J., & BLACK, A.H. 1974. The effect of restraint and noncontingent preshock on subsequent escape learning in rat. Learning and Motivation, 5, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. BRAUD, W., WEPMANN, B.R., & RUSSO, D. 1969. Task and species generality of the “learned helplessness” phenomenon. Psychonomic Science, 16, 154–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. CASPY, T., FROMMER, R., WEINER, I., & LUBOW, R.E. 1979. Generality of Us preexposure effects: Effects of shock or food preexposure on water escape. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. COSTELLO, C.G. 1978. A critical review of Seligman’s laboratory experiments on learned helplessness and depression in humans. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 21–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. GLAZER, H.I., & WEISS, J.M. 1976a. Long-term interference effect: An alternative to learned helplessness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 201–213.

    Google Scholar 

  10. GLAZEK, H.I., & WEISS, J.M. 1976b. Long-term and transitory interference effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  11. LUBOW, R.E., WEINER, I., & SCHNUR, P. 1981. Conditioned attention theory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15). New York: Academic Press.

  12. MAIER, S.F., & JACKSON, R.L. 1979. Learned helplessness: All of us were right (and wrong); Inescapable shock has multiple effects. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press.

  13. MAIER, S.F., & SELIGMAN, M.E.P. 1976. Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 3–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. OVERMIER, J.B., & SELIGMAN, M.E.P. 1967. Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 63, 28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. SELIGMAN, M.E.P. 1975. Helplessness: On depression development, and death. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  16. SELIGMAN, M.E.P., & MAIER, S.F. 1967. Failure to escape traumatic shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is part of a thesis submitted to Bar-Ilan University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ma degree by the first author under the direction of the second author. The research was supported, in part, by a grant to the second author from the Israel Commission of Basic Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caspy, T., Lubow, R.E. Performance Decrement Following Shock Preexposure: The Effect of Number and Duration of Escapable and Inescapable Shocks. Psychol Rec 31, 183–194 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394734

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394734

Navigation