Abstract
The relationship between properties of sample stimuli and matching accuracy was examined in four delayed symbolic matching-to-sample problems with pigeons. A peck on the center key of a three-key chamber presented one of two samples. Following one sample a response on the red side key was correct, and following the other sample a response on the green key was correct. In the first problem the temporal properties of a stimulus served as a sample. The correct side key response depended upon whether a yellow sample was “short” (.5 sec) or “long” (4 sec). The second problem compared food and blackout samples, and the third problem compared color and form samples. The fourth problem combined stimulus type and duration by examining.3- and 3-sec color and form samples. The main results were that (a) these sample stimuli produced retention curves that resembled those reported in previous research, and (b) no differences in matching accuracy were observed between.5 and 4-sec stimulus-duration samples, food and blackout, and color and form samples. These data can best be described by the rule statement “If sample A is presented, then peck one side key” and “If sample A is not presented, then peck the other side key.” This analysis suggests that some matching problems may be solved by considering the presence and absence of only one of the two sample types, and that the characteristics of the other sample become irrelevant.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CAPALDI, E.J. 1971. Memory and learning: A sequential viewpoint. In W.K. Honig & P.H.R. James (Eds.), Animal memory. New York: Academic Press.
CARTER, D.E., & ECKERMAN, D.A. 1975. Symbolic matching by pigeons: Rate of learning complexdiscriminations predicted from simplediscriminations. Sc/W/c?, 187, 662–664.
CARTER, D.E., & WERNER, T.J. 1978. Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 565–601.
COWLES, J. T., & NISSEN, H. W. 1937. Reward-expectancy in delayed responses of chimpanzees. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 24, 345–358.
CUMMING, W.W., & BERRYMAN, R. 1965. The complex discriminated operant: Studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
CUMMING, W. W., BERRYMAN, R., & COHEN, L. R. 1965. Acquisition and transfer of zero-delay matching. Psychological Reports, 17, 435–445.
D’AMATO, M. R. 1973. Delayed matching and short-term memory in monkeys. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press.
D’AMATO, M. R., & O’NEILL, W. 1971. Effects of delay-interval illumination on matching behavior in the capuchin monkey. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 327–333.
DEVINE, J. V., JONES, L. C., NEVILLE, J. W., & SAKAI, D. J. 1977. Sample duration and type of stimuli in delayed matching-to-sample in rhesus monkeys. Animal Learning & Behavior, 5, 57–62.
FARTHING, G. W., OPUDA, M. J. 1974. Transfer of matching-to-sample in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental A nalysis of Behavior, 21, 199–213.
FARTHING, G. W., WAGNER, J. M., GILMOUR, S., & WAXMAN, H. M. 1977. Short-term memory and information processing in pigeons. Learning and Motivation, 8, 520–532.
GRANT, D. S. 1976. Effect of sample presentation time on long-delay matching in the pigeon. Learning and Motivation, 7, 580–590.
GREEN, D. M., & SWETS, J. A. 1966. Signal detection theory andpsychophysics. New York: Wiley.
HERZOG, H. L., GRANT, D. S., & ROBERTS, W. A. 1977. Effects of sample duration and spaced repetition upon delayed matching-to-sample in monkeys (Macaca arctoides and Saimirisciureus). Animal Learning & Behavior, 5, 347–354.
HONIG, W. K. 1978. Studies of working memory in the pigeon. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. H. Honig (Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
HONIG, W. K., & JAMES, P. H. R. (Eds.). 1971. Animal memory. New York: Academic Press.
LAWRENCE, D.H. 1963. The nature of a stimulus: Some relationships between learning and perception, in. S. Koch (Ed), Psychology: A study of a science. (Vol. 5). New York: McGraw-Hill.
MAKI, W. S. 1979. Pigeons’ short-term memories for surprising vs. expected reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Animal Learning & Behavior, 7, 31–37.
MAKI, W.S., JR., & LEITH, C.R. 1973. Shared attention in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 19, 345–349.
MAKI, W. S., JR., & LEUIN, T. C. 1972. Information processing by pigeons. Science, 176, 535–536.
MAKI, W. S., MOE, J. C., & BIERLEY, C. M. 1977. Short-term memory for stimuli, responses, and reinforcers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 156–177.
MEDIN, D. L., ROBERTS, W. A., & DAVIS, R. T. (Eds.). 1976. Processes of animal memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
NELSON, K. R., & WASSERMAN, E. A. 1978. Temporal factors influencing the pigeon’s successive matching-to-sample performance: Sample duration, intertrial interval, and retention interval. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 153–162.
ROBERTS, W.A. 1972. Short-term memory in the pigeon: Effects of repetition and spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 74–83.
ROBERTS, W. A., & GRANT, D. S. 1974. Short-term memory in the pigeon with presentation time precisely controlled. Learning and Motivation, 5, 393–408.
ROBERTS, W. A., & GRANT, D. S. 1976. Studies of short-term memory in the pigeon using a delayed matching to sample procedure. In D. L. Medin, W. A. Roberts, & R. T. Davis (Eds.), Processes of animal memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
SCHOENFELD, W. N., & CUMMING, W. W. 1963. Behavior and perception. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science. (Vol. 5). New York: McGraw-Hill.
SHIMP, C. P., & MOFFITT, M. 1977. Short-term memory in the pigeon: Delayed-paired- comparison procedures and some results. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 13–25.
SIEGEL, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
STADDON, J. E. R. 1972. Temporal control and the theory of reinforcement schedules. In R. M. Gilbert & J.R. Millenson (Eds.), Reinforcement: Behavioral analyses. New York: Academic Press.
STADDON, J. E. R. 1974. Temporal control, attention, and memory. Psychological Review, 81, 375–391.
STUBBS, A. 1968. The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 223–238.
STUBBS, D. A., VAUTIN, S. J., REID, H. M., & DELEHANTY, D. L. 1978. Discrimination functions of schedule stimuli and memory: A combination of schedule and choice procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 167–180.
TRANBERG, D. K., & RILLING, M. 1980. Delay-interval illumination changes interfere with pigeon short-term memory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 33, 39–49.
WALLACE, J., STEINERT, P. A., SCOBIE, S. R., & SPEAR, N. E. 1980. Stimulus modality and short-term memory in rats. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 10–16.
WILKIE, D. M. 1978. Delayed symbolic matching to sample in the pigeon. The Psychological Record, 28, 463–469.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Special thanks goes to Alan Stubbs for his helpful discussions on the theoretical implications of these experiments and for comments on an earlier version of this paper. The first author is currently an Ipa staff fellow at the National Institutes of Health (Nincds) in Bethesda, Maryland on leave from Bloomsburg State College. The second author is currently at Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, and the third author is at the Bucks County Association for the Blind, Newton, Pa.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, S.L., Calisto, G. & Lentz, B.E. Comparisons of Sample Stimuli in Delayed Symbolic Matching-to-Sample: Some Results and Implications. Psychol Rec 31, 77–93 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394722
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394722