Abstract
Male students were pretested on absorption and three measures of hypnotic responsiveness, and were then randomly assigned to three treatments. One group meditated for eight sessions, while a second listened analytically to lectures about hypnosis for eight sessions. The third group was a no treatment control. Finally all students were posttested on absorption and hypnotic responsivity measures. Degree of meditating remained stable across sessions and meditating subjects were much more likely than those who listened to lectures to report intrusions into their attending. Neither the meditation nor the listening treatments enhanced hypnotic responsivity or absorption.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
ARGÜELLES, J., & ARGÜELLES, M. 1972. Mandal. Berkeley: Shambhala.
AS, A. 1962. Non-hypnotic experiences related to hypnotizability in male and female college students. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 3, 112–121.
BARBER, T. X., SPANOS, N. P., & CHAVES, J. F. 1974. Hypnosis, imagination and human potentialities. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
BOWERS, K. S. 1976. Hypnosis for the seriously curious. Monterey, California: Brooks Cole.
DEIKMAN, A. J. 1971. Bimodal consciousness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 25, 481–489.
FIELD, P. B. 1965. An inventory scale of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 13, 238–249.
GUR, R. C., & GUR, R. E. 1974. Handedness, sex and eyedness as moderating variables in the relationship between susceptibility and functional brain asymmetry. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 635–643.
HILGARD, J. R. 1974. Imaginative involvement: Some characteristics of the highly hypnotizable and non-hypnotizable. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, 138–156.
MAUPIN, E. W. 1965. Individual differences in response to a Zen meditation exercise. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 139–145.
SHOR, R. E., & ORNE, E. C. 1962. The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Form A. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
SPANOS, N. P., & MCPEAKE, J. D. 1975. Involvement in everyday imaginative activities, attitudes toward hypnosis, and hypnotic suggestibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 594–598.
SPANOS, N. P., RIVERS, S. M., & GOTTLIEB, J. 1978. Hypnotic responsivity, meditation, and laterality of eye movements. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 566–569.
SPANOS, N. P., STAM, H. J., RIVERS, S. M., & RADTKE, H. L. In press. Meditation expectation and performance on indices of nonanalytic attending. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis.
SPANOS, N. P., STEGGLES, S., RADTKE-BODORIK, H. L., & RIVERS, S. M. 1979. Nonanalytic attending, hypnotic susceptibility, and psychological well being in trained meditators and non-meditators. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 85–87.
TELLEGEN, A., & ATKINSON, G. A. 1974. Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268–277.
VAN NUYS, D. 1973. Meditation, attention and hypnotic susceptibility: A correlational study. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 21, 59–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spanos, N.P., Gottlieb, J. & Rivers, S.M. The Effects of Short-Term Meditation Practice on Hypnotic Responsivity. Psychol Rec 30, 343–348 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394683
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394683