Skip to main content
Log in

On the use of Animals in Psychological Research

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper briefly examines some of the inconsistencies and distortions associated with Bowd’s (1980) opposition to psychological research on animals. By examining the vast amount of neglected animal suffering which occurs as a consequence of human existence, coupled with the potential benefits of animal research, we argue that the efforts of many animal rights advocates are misconstrued and misdirected. Moreover, the evolution of moral and ethical behavior in man may be such that it is not applicable to other species. While we do not condone needless suffering in animals and would welcome the suggestion of viable alternatives, we argue that there is far more of a moral imperative to continue to do animal research than to abandon it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Note

  1. BURGHARDT, G. M. Beyond conspecifics: Ethology and animal rights. Paper presented at the meeting of the Animal Behavior Society, New Orleans, June 1979.

References

  • ALUMETS, J., HAKANSON, R., SUNDLER, F., & THORELL, J. 1979. Neuronal localisation of immunoreactive enkephalin and /J-endorphin in the earthworm. Nature, 279, 805–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BEATTY, W. W., & FESSLER, R. G. 1977. Gonadectomy and sensitivity to electric shock in the rat. Physiology and Behavior, 19, 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BOWD, A. D. 1980. Ethical reservations about psychological research with animals. The Psychological Record, 30, 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARTER, R. 1965. Breakthrough: The saga of Jonas Salk. New York: Trident Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DESMOND, A. J. 1979. The ape’s reflexion. New York: The Dial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GALLUP, G. G., JR. 1979. Self-awareness in primates. American Scientist, 67, 417–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • GALLUP, G. G., JR., BOREN, J. L., Gagliardi, G. J., & WALLNAU, L. B. 1977. A mirror for the mind of man, or will the chimpanzee create an identity crisis for Homo sapiens? Journal of Human Evolution, 6, 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GALLUP, G. G., JR., & SUAREZ, S. D. 1980. An ethological analysis of open-field behaviour in chickens. Animal Behaviour, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRIFFIN, D. R. 1976. The question of animal awareness. New York: The Rockefeller University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HENNESSEY, T. M., RUCKER, W. B., & MCDIARMID, C. G. 1979. Classical conditioning in paramecia. Animal Learning & behavior, 7, 417–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MASER, J. D., & SELIGMAN, M. E. P. 1977. Psychopathology: Experimental models. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • MASON, W. A. 1976. Environmental models and mental modes: Representational processes in great apes and man. American Psychologist, 31, 284–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PREMACK, D., & WOODRUFF, G. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SELIGMAN, M. E. P. 1975. Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • SINGER, P. 1975. Animal liberation. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • STERNBACH, R. A. 1968. Pain: A psychophysiological analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TRIVERS, R. L. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WALLNAU, L. B., & GALLUP, G. G., JR. 1977. A serotonergic, midbrain-raphe model of tonic immobility. BiobehavioralReviews, 1, 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WILSON, J. G. 1977. Embryotoxicity of drugs in man. In J. G. Wilson & F. C. Fraser (Eds.), Handbook of teratology (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallup, G.G., Suarez, S.D. On the use of Animals in Psychological Research. Psychol Rec 30, 211–218 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394671

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394671

Navigation