Abstract
Rats’ running latencies were recorded prior to and following decisions in a conditional discrimination in a modified T maze. Postdecisional latencies, by Signal Detection Theory analysis, failed to discriminate correct from incorrect choices (d’ = −.09). Decision latencies, however, yielded d’ =.57, which is significantly greater than zero. Fast choice times were associated with correct responses. The data were interpreted as support for a non-feedback view of postdecision behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BLOUGH, D. S. 1967. Stimulus generalization as signal detection in pigeons. Science, 158, 940–941.
CLARKE, F. R., BIRDSALL, T. G., & TANNER, W. P., JR. 1959. Two types of Roc curves and definitons of parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 629–630.
EGAN, J. P., SCHULMAN, A. I., & GREENBERG, G. Z. 1959. Operating characteristics determined by binary decisions and ratings. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 768–773.
GOUREVITCH, V., & GALANTER, E. 1967. A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions. Psychometrika, 32, 25–33.
HACK, M. H. 1963. Receiver operating characteristics in the rat. Science, 139, 758–759.
HOCHHAUS, L., & ANTES, J. R. 1973. Speech identification and “knowing that you know.” Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 131–132.
MURDOCK, B. B., JR. 1966. The criterion problem in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 317–324.
NORMAN, D. A., & WICKELGREN, W. A. 1969. Strength theory of decision rules and latency in retrieval from short-term memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 192–208.
SIMPSON, A. J., & FITTER, M. J. 1973. What is the best index of detectability? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 481–488.
SPEAR, N. E., & PAVLIK, W. B. 1966. Percentage of reinforcement and reward magnitude effects in a T maze: Between and within subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 521–528.
YEAGER, D., & DUNCAN, I. 1971. Signal-detection analysis of luminance generalization in goldfish using latency as a graded response measure. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 353–355.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant awarded to the second author by the State of Oklahoma. The authors wish to thank Julie Sage-Day for critically reading a draft of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marlin, N.A., Hochhaus, L. ROC Analysis of Choice Accuracy in Rats. Psychol Rec 30, 89–93 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394657
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394657