Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Differential Effectiveness of Social Reinforcement with Children in Laboratory and Natural Settings: A Conditioned Reinforcement Analysis

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effectiveness of social consequences as positive reinforcers for children in natural settings and their weaknesses as such in laboratory settings are described, and an argument based on the methodology of conditioned reinforcement research is developed to account for this discrepancy. Parallels are drawn between (a) the different methods for establishing (training) and assessing (testing) conditioned reinforcers and (b) the different contexts in which social reinforcers are established and delivered. First, neither conditioned nor social reinforcers are very effective when delivered in isolation (extinction) from the conditions in which they presumably acquire their function—the training conditions of conditioned reinforcers or the natural environment of social reinforcers. Second, the more complex scheduling methods used in recent conditioned reinforcement research are analogous to the complex conditions under which social reinforcers are delivered in the natural environment; in these cases, the stimuli are substantially more effective as reinforcers. By taking into account the context in which social reinforcers are delivered, a basis is provided for explaining their differential effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BANDURA, A. 1977. Social (earning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • BANDURA, A., & WALTERS, R.H. 1963. Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARON, R.M. 1966. Social reinforcement effects as a function of social reinforcement history. Psychological Review, 73, 527–539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BIJOU, S.W., & BAER, D.M. 1978. Behavior analysis of development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIRNBRAUER, J.S. 1971. Effects of pairing stimuli with reinforcement on multiple schedule performance of children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 355–365.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BLOOM, K. 1979. Evaluation of infant vocal conditioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 60–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CAIRNS, R.B. 1967. The informational properties of verbal and nonverbal events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 353–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CAIRNS, R.B. 1970. Meaning and attention as determinants of social reinforcer effectiveness. Child Development, 41, 1067–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAIRNS, R.B., & LEWIS, M. 1962. Dependency and the evaluation of the reinforcement stimulus. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CAIRNS, R.B., & PARIS, S.G. 1971. Informational determinants of social reinforcement effectiveness among retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 76, 362–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, S.L., & LENTZ, B.E. 1976. Factors influencing responding under multiple schedules of conditioned and unconditioned reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 395–404.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FANTINO, E. 1977. Conditioned reinforcement: Choice and information. In W.K. Honig & J.E.R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Clffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAVELL, J.E., & FAVELL, R.E. 1972. Control of preference in children by conditioned positive reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 107–112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GEWIRTZ, J.L. 1969. Mechanisms of social learning: Some roles of stimulation and behavior in early human development. In D.A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOLLUB, L. 1977. Conditioned reinforcement: Schedule effects. In W.K. Honig & J.E.R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARRIS, F.R., WOLF, M.M., & BAER, D.M. 1964. Effects of adult social reinforcement on child behavior. Young Children, 20, 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • HENDRY, D.P. (Ed.). 1969. Conditioned reinforcement. Homewood, Ill.: The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J.R. 1959. Interbehavioralpsychology. Granville, Ohio: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J.R. 1970. An analysis of the experimental analysis of behavior (Teab). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 101–108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J.R. 1971. The aim and progress of psychology and other sciences. Chicago, Ill.: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOCH, J. 1967. Conditioned orienting reactions in two-month old infants. British Journal of Psychology, 58, 105–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KOCH, J. 1968. Conditioned orienting reactions to persons and things in 2–5 month-old infants. Human Development, 11, 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LAUTEN, M.H., & BIRNBRAUER, J.S. 1974. The efficacy of “right” as a function of its relationship with reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LAYNE, C. 1978. Measurement of children’s preferences for signals of correctness versus pennies in relation to socioeconomic status and sex. The Psychological Record, 28, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVIN, G., & SIMMONS, J.Q. 1962. Response to food and praise by emotionally disturbed boys. Psychological Reports, 2, 539–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LOCKE, B.J. 1969. Verbal conditioning with retarded subjects: Establishment or reinstatement of effective reinforcing consequences. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 73, 621–626.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LOVAAS, O.I., FRIETAG, G., KINDER, M.I., RUBENSTEIN, B.D., SCHAEFFER, B., & SIMMONS, J.Q. 1966. Establishment of social reinforcement in two schizophrenic children on the basis of food. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 4, 109–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LOVAAS, O.I., SCHAEFFER, B.M., & SIMMONS, J.Q. 1965. Building social behavior in young children by use of electric shock. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1, 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • MADSEN, C.H., BECKER, W.C., & THOMAS, D.R. 1968. Rules, praise, and ignoring: Elements of elementary classroom control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 139–150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, N.E., & DOLLARD, J. 1941. Social learning and imitation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORRIS, E.K. 1978. Some relationships between the psychologies of Kantor and Skinner. The Interbehaviorist, 8, (4), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORRIS, E.K., & REDD, W.H. 1975. Children’s performance and social preferences for positive, negative, and mixed adult-child interactions. Child Development, 46, 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MYER, W.J., & OFFENBACH, S.I. 1962. Effectiveness of reward and punishment as a function of task complexity. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 532–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ORNE, M.J. 1962. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PARTON, D. A., & ROSS, A. O. 1965. Social reinforcement of children’s motor behavior: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PARTON, D.A., & ROSS, A.O. 1967. A reply to “The use of rate as a measure of response in the studies of social reinforcement.” Psychological Bulletin, 67, 323–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • REDD, W.H., MORRIS, E.K., & MARTIN, J.A. 1975. Effects of positive and negative adult-child interactions on children’s social preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RIBES-INESTA, E., DURAN, L., EVANS, B., FELIX, G., RIVERA, G., & SANCHEZ, S. 1973. An experimental evaluation of tokens as conditioned reinforcers in retarded children. Behavior Research and Therapy, 11, 125–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROSE, J.E., & FANTINO, E. 1978. Conditioned reinforcement and discrimination in second-order schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 393–418.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ROSENTHAL, R., & ROSNOW, R.L. 1969. Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCOTT, R.M., BURTON, R.V., & YARROW, M.R. 1967. Social reinforcement under natural conditions. Child Development, 38, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEARS, R.R., MACCOBY, E.E., & LEVIN, H. 1957. Patterns of child rearing. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B.F. 1953. Science and human behavior. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPENCE, J.T. 1970. Verbal reinforcement combinations and concept identification learning: The role of non-reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STEINMAN, W.M. 1968. The strengthening of verbal approval in retardates by discrimination training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6, 100–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • THOMAS, J.R. 1969. Maintenance of behavior by conditioned reinforcement in the signaled absence of primary reinforcement. In D.P. Hendry (Ed.), Conditioned reinforcement. Homewood, Ill.: The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMAS, J.R., & JOHNSON, C. 1970. Maintenance of forced-interval responding by conditioned reinforcement in multiple schedules. Psychonomic Science, 19, 135–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WAHLER, R.G. 1972. Some ecological problems in child behavior modification. In S. W. Bijou & E. Ribes-Inesta (Eds.), behavior modification: Issues and extensions. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WARREN, V.L., & CAIRNS, R.B. 1972. Social reinforcement satiation: An outcome of frequency or ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13, 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WIKE, E.L. (Ed.). 1966. Secondary reinforcement: Selected experiments. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development, Haworth Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045, USA

    Edward K. Morris

Authors
  1. Edward K. Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Preparation of this paper was supported by the University of Kansas General Research Fund (Grant #3292-x038). Appreciation is extended to Ruth Morrow, David Rider, Bob Sharkey, Jim Sherman, and Greg Wagner for their helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. Portions of this paper were presented previously at the Association for Behavior Analysis Convention, Dearborn, Michigan, June, 1979.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morris, E.K. The Differential Effectiveness of Social Reinforcement with Children in Laboratory and Natural Settings: A Conditioned Reinforcement Analysis. Psychol Rec 30, 9–16 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394650

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394650

Search

Navigation