Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Differentially Computed Factor Scores on Statistical Decisions

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Factor scores generated via five different computational procedures were used, independently, as dependent variables in 117 univariate analyses of variance, 18 multivariate analyses of variance, 18 multiple discriminant analyses, and 14 canonical correlation analyses. Significance probabilities and their associated F ratios and chi-square. values were examined across the scoring methods to determine which of the differentially computed scores produced the smallest probability in each statistical test. Obtained frequencies (of smallest p values) were submitted to an appropriate chi-square test to contrast the effectiveness of the scoring procedures in the various statistical analyses. The results indicated no significant differences (at alpha =.05) in the observed versus expected frequencies across the five factor score algorithms in the univariate or multivariate tests. However a recurrent trend shown in the data suggests that the regressions technique may be the most effective way to compute subjects’ factor scores when they are to be subsequently used as criterion variables in statistical analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALWIN, DUANE F. 1973. The use of factor analysis in the construction of linear composites in social research. Sociological Methods and Research, 2, 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DAGENAIS, F., & MARASCUILO, LEONARD A. 1973. The effect of factor scores, Guttman scores, and simple sum scores on the size of F-ratios in an analysis of variance design. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 8, 491–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FINN, JEREMY D. 1972. Multivariance: Multivariate and univariate analysis of variance, covariance, and regression, version V. Ann Arbor, Michigan: National Educational Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • GORSUCH, RICHARD L. 1974. Factor analysis. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • HORN, JOHN L. 1965. An empirical comparison of methods for estimating factor scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 15, 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KIM, JAE-ON. 1975. Factor analysis. In Norman Nie, C. Hadlai Hull, Jean Jenkins, Karin Steinbrenner, & Dale Bent (Eds.), Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDONALD, RODERICK P., & BURR, E. J. 1967. A comparison of four methods of constructing factor scores. Psychometrika, 32, 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOSELEY, EDWARD C, & KLETT, JAMES. 1964. An empirical comparison of factor scoring methods. Psychological Reports, 14, 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NUNNALLY, JUM C. 1967. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laux, D.F., Tucker, R.K. The Effects of Differentially Computed Factor Scores on Statistical Decisions. Psychol Rec 29, 501–516 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394639

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394639

Navigation