Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Withdrawal from the Negative Cue on Learning a Two-Choice Discrimination

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three groups of rats learned a black-white discrimination in a Grice box. All subjects were reinforced with two food pellets for correct choices. No-Retrace subjects were confined in the negative end-box after errors; Retrace subjects were allowed to withdraw after errors from the negative end-box to the choice-point or start-box; and Take-Out subjects were manually removed from the negative end-box immediately after inspecting the empty food dish. All subjects were trained to criterion and then reversed to criterion. The Retrace group learned the original discrimination significantly slower than both the No-Retrace and Take-Out groups, which did not differ from each other. The same effect occurred on reversal. Apparently, the postnonrein forcement stimuli that the Retrace group encountered retarded discrimination learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Note

  1. DENNY, M. R. 1977. Allowing withdrawal from nonreinforcement: Inhibition of runway performance in partially reinforced rats. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, May.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • ADELMAN, H. M., & MAATSCH, J. L. 1955. Resistance to extinction as a function of the type of response elicited by frustration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 61–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BARTUS, R. T., & JOHNSON, H. R. 1976. Effects of postresponse visual stimuli on visual discrimination learning in the rhesus monkey. Learning and Motivation, !, 431–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARTUS, R. T., & LeVERE, T. E. 1976. Storage and utilization of information within a discrimination trial. In D. Medin, W. Roberts, & R. Davis (Eds.), Processes of animal memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DALY, H. B., & McCROSKERY, J. H. 1973. Acquisition of a bar-press response to escape frustrative nonreward and reduced reward. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DENNY, M. R. 1971. A theory of experimental extinction and its relation to a general theory. In H. Kendler & J. Spence (Eds.), Essays in neobehaviorism: A memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • DENNY, M. R., & ADELMAN, H. M. 1955. Elicitation theory: I. An analysis of two typical learning situations. Psychological Review, 62, 290–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GELLERMAN, L.W. 1933. Chance orders of alternating stimuli in visual discrimination experiments. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 42, 207–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRICE, G. R. 1948. The acquisition of a visual discrimination habit following response to a single stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 633–642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HULL, C. L., & SPENCE, K. W. 1938. “Correction” vs. “non-correction” methods of trial-and-error learning in rats. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 25, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KALISH, D. 1946. The non-correction method and the delayed response problem of Blodgett and McCutchan. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 39, 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KAMIN, L. J. 1969. Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVERE, T. E., & BARTUS, R. T. 1973. Stimulus information and primate discrimination learning: The influence of postresponse stimulus information. Learning and Motivation, 4, 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. 1974. The psychology of animal learning. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MUNN, N. L. 1950. Handbook of psychological research on the rat. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHEFFÉ, H. 1959. The analysis of variance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEWARD, J. P. 1943. An experimental analysis of maze discrimination. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 35, 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TOWART, E. M., & BOE, E. E. 1965. Comparison of the correction and the rerun noncorrection methods in maze learning. Psychological Reports, 16, 407–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WAGNER, A. R., RUDY, J. W., & WHITLOW, J. W. 1973. Rehearsal in animal conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 407–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research is based upon a thesis submitted by the first author in partial fulfillment of the M.A. degree at Western Michigan University, under the guidance of the second author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, C.M., Denny, M.R. Effect of Withdrawal from the Negative Cue on Learning a Two-Choice Discrimination. Psychol Rec 29, 85–91 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394593

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394593

Navigation