Skip to main content
Log in

A New Shock Delivery Method for Testing Preference for Signalled Shock

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a method for delivering tail shock in which the electrodes cannot be dislodged and which allows the rat a full range of ambulatory behaviors. Using this method in a shuttle box environment, we have shown that a significant number of rats consistently prefer signalled over unsignalled shock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BADIA, P., Culbertson, S., & LEWIS, P. 1971. The relative aversiveness of signalled versus unsignalled avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 113–121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BERK, A. M., Marlin, N. A., & MILLER, R. R. 1977. System for delivering tailshock to freely ambulatory rats. Physiology & Behavior, 19, 815–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIEDERMAN, G. B., & FUREDY, J. J. 1973. Preference-for-signalled-shock phenomenon: Effects of shock modifiability and light reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 380–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIEDERMAN, G. B., & FUREDY, J. J. 1976. Preference for signalled shock in rats? Instrumentation and methodological errors in the archival literature. The Psychological Record, 26, 502–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • DE VILLIERS, P. 1977. Choice in concurrent schedules and quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARSH, J. 1978. Preference for signalled shock: A well-established and reliable phenomenon. The Psychological Record, 28, 281–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • HYMOWITZ, N. 1977. Effects of the intensity of electric shock on response suppression during multiple and mixed schedules of signalled and unsignalled electric-shock delivery. The Psychological Record, 27, 425–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARLIN, N. A., BERK, A. M., & MILLER, R. R. 1978. Modification and avoidance of unmodifiable and unavoidable foot shock. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 203–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, R. R., DANIEL, D., & BERK, A. M. 1974. Successive reversals of a discriminated preference for signalled tailshock. Animal Learning and Behavior, 2, 271–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, R. R., MARLIN, N. A., & BERK, A. M. 1977. Reliability and sources of control of preference for signalled shock. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5, 303–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PERKINS, C. C., Jr., Seymann, R. G., Levis, D. J., & SPENCER, H., Jr. 1966. Factors affecting preference for signal-shock over shock-signal. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 190–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SNAPPER, A. G., & KADDEN, R. M. 1973. Time-sharing in a small computer based on a behavioral notation system. In B. Weiss (Ed.), Digital computers in the behavioral laboratory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEISS, J. M. 1970. Somatic effects of predictable and unpredictable shock. Psychosomatic Medicine, 32, 397–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the Medical Research Service of the Veterans Administration. The authors acknowledge the help of Jerry Applegate in doing the work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Natelson, B.H., Adamus, J.E. & Hymowitz, N. A New Shock Delivery Method for Testing Preference for Signalled Shock. Psychol Rec 29, 79–84 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394592

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394592

Navigation