Abstract
We present a method for delivering tail shock in which the electrodes cannot be dislodged and which allows the rat a full range of ambulatory behaviors. Using this method in a shuttle box environment, we have shown that a significant number of rats consistently prefer signalled over unsignalled shock.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BADIA, P., Culbertson, S., & LEWIS, P. 1971. The relative aversiveness of signalled versus unsignalled avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 113–121.
BERK, A. M., Marlin, N. A., & MILLER, R. R. 1977. System for delivering tailshock to freely ambulatory rats. Physiology & Behavior, 19, 815–818.
BIEDERMAN, G. B., & FUREDY, J. J. 1973. Preference-for-signalled-shock phenomenon: Effects of shock modifiability and light reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 380–386.
BIEDERMAN, G. B., & FUREDY, J. J. 1976. Preference for signalled shock in rats? Instrumentation and methodological errors in the archival literature. The Psychological Record, 26, 502–514.
DE VILLIERS, P. 1977. Choice in concurrent schedules and quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
HARSH, J. 1978. Preference for signalled shock: A well-established and reliable phenomenon. The Psychological Record, 28, 281–289.
HYMOWITZ, N. 1977. Effects of the intensity of electric shock on response suppression during multiple and mixed schedules of signalled and unsignalled electric-shock delivery. The Psychological Record, 27, 425–440.
MARLIN, N. A., BERK, A. M., & MILLER, R. R. 1978. Modification and avoidance of unmodifiable and unavoidable foot shock. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 203–205.
MILLER, R. R., DANIEL, D., & BERK, A. M. 1974. Successive reversals of a discriminated preference for signalled tailshock. Animal Learning and Behavior, 2, 271–274.
MILLER, R. R., MARLIN, N. A., & BERK, A. M. 1977. Reliability and sources of control of preference for signalled shock. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5, 303–308.
PERKINS, C. C., Jr., Seymann, R. G., Levis, D. J., & SPENCER, H., Jr. 1966. Factors affecting preference for signal-shock over shock-signal. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 190–196.
SNAPPER, A. G., & KADDEN, R. M. 1973. Time-sharing in a small computer based on a behavioral notation system. In B. Weiss (Ed.), Digital computers in the behavioral laboratory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
WEISS, J. M. 1970. Somatic effects of predictable and unpredictable shock. Psychosomatic Medicine, 32, 397–408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Medical Research Service of the Veterans Administration. The authors acknowledge the help of Jerry Applegate in doing the work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Natelson, B.H., Adamus, J.E. & Hymowitz, N. A New Shock Delivery Method for Testing Preference for Signalled Shock. Psychol Rec 29, 79–84 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394592
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394592