Skip to main content
Log in

Response-Contingent Visual Exposure to Conspecific and Social Influence on Key Pecking in Japanese Quail

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Operant key pecking was assessed in eight adult male Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Subjects could peck either of two response keys to obtain bird chow reinforcement. In addition, one of the keys controlled visual exposure to conspecifics by altering illumination in a companion compartment adjacent to the subject. One, two, or no companion quail were present. Pecks on the “companion” key started or maintained exposure to companions. Results indicated that (a) subjects reduced significantly the frequency of pecks maintaining companion exposure when companion quail were actually present, (b) cumulative duration of exposure to companions was significantly lower when companions were present, and (c) the overall rate of key pecking was inhibited significantly during exposure to companions. These data contribute to the establishment of a mediating link between observed social inhibition of food-reinforced key pecking and apparent lack of subject preference for visual exposure to conspecifics during operant testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CHEREK, D. R., & PICKENS, R. 1970. Schedule-induced aggression as a function of fixed-ratio value. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 309–311.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CHEREK, D. R., THOMPSON, T., & HEISTAD, G. T. 1973. Responding maintained by the opportunity to attack during an interval food reinforcement schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 19, 113–123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DENI, R. 1977a. Inhibition of operant responding in Japanese quail during visual exposure to a companion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DENI, R. 1977b. Duration of exposures to a conspecific and social inhibition of operant behavior in Japanese quail. Psychological Reports, 41, 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DENI, R. 1978. Social influences on operant behavior in Japanese quail: Sex differences among subjects, and sex and age differences among companions. The Psychological Record, 28, 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLORY, R. 1969. Attack behavior as a function of minimum inter-food interval. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 825–828.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GENTRY, W. D. 1968. Fixed-ratio schedule-induced aggression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 813–817.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LINTON, M., & GALLO, P. S. 1975. The practical statistician: Simplified handbook of statistics. Belmont, Ca.: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, T. 1964. Visual reinforcement in fighting cocks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 45–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • WEISS, R. F., & MILLER, F. G. 1971. The drive theory of social facilitation. Psychological Review, 78, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by NICHD Grant No. 00973.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deni, R. Response-Contingent Visual Exposure to Conspecific and Social Influence on Key Pecking in Japanese Quail. Psychol Rec 28, 375–382 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394549

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394549

Navigation