Skip to main content
Log in

Classical Conditioning of “Hypnotic” Arm Movement

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to a classical conditioning view of hypnosis, responses used as criteria of hypnosis should develop via classical conditioning without the necessity for hypnotic induction. This hypothesis was tested by having experimental subjects first experience one trigram (e.g., “bex”) in conjunction with heavy objects and another trigram (e.g., “pob”) in conjunction with light objects. Control subjects had the trigrams associated with rough and smooth tactual stimuli in a random manner. The test for conditioning was an adaptation of standard arm lowering and levitation procedures. During the test, the subject was instructed to imagine one trigram in the left hand and the other trigram in the right hand. Objective bilateral arm movement in the conditioned direction, subjective reports of feelings of heaviness and lightness, and qualitative characteristics of experimental subjects’ behavior led to the conclusion that hypnotic behavior was conditioned to the trigram.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BARBER, T. X. 1965. Measuring “hypnotic-like” suggestibility with and without “hypnotic induction”; psychometric properties, norms, and variables, influencing response to the Barber Suggestibility Scale (Bss). Psychological Reports, 16, 809–844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BARBER, T. X. 1969. Hypnosis: A scientific approach. Princeton: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOLLES, R. C. 1975. Learning theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRAY, C. W. 1928. Transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CORN-BECKER, F., WELCH, L., & FISICHELLI, V. 1949. Conditioning factors underlying hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 212–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DAS, J. P. 1959. A theory of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 7, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DAS, J. P. 1969. Verbal conditioning and behavior. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • DELPRATO, D. J. 1977a. Observing covert behavior (“mindreading”) with Chevreul’s pendulum. The Psychological Record, 27, 473–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • DELPRATO, D. J. 1977b. Pavlovian conditioning of Chevreul’s movement. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 20, 124–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EDMONSTON, W. E., Jr. 1967. Stimulus-response theory of hypnosis. In J. E. Gordon (Ed.), Handbook of clinical and experimental hypnosis. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLSON, D. G. 1941. Hallucinations produced by sensory conditioning. Journal of Experimen tal Psychology, 28, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HUDGINS, C. V. 1933. Conditioning and the voluntary control of the pupillary light reflex. Journal of General Psychology, 8, 3–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HULL, C. L. 1933. Hypnosis and suggestibility. New York: D. Appleton-Century Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R., & SMITH, N. W. 1975. The science of psychology: An interbehavioral survey. Chicago: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MENZIES, R. 1941. Further studies of conditioned vasomotor responses in human subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 457–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MUNN, N. L. 1932. Bilateral transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SACHS, L. B. 1971. Construing hypnosis as modifiable behavior. In A. Jacobs & L. B. Sachs (Eds.), The psychology of private events. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SALTER, A. 1949. Conditioned reflex therapy. New York: Capricorn.

    Google Scholar 

  • SARBIN, T. R., & COE, W. C. 1972. Hypnosis: A social psychological analysis of influence communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPANOS, N. P., & BARBER, T. X. 1972. Cognitive activity during “hypnotic” suggestibility: Goal-directed fantasy and the experience of non volition. Journal of Personality, 40, 510–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WATERS, J. E., & KODMAN, F. 1962. Abstract conditioning. Journal of Psychology, 53, 441–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WELCH, L. 1947. A behavioristic explanation of the mechanism of suggestion and hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 359–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YOUNG, P. C. 1941. Experimental hypnotism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holmes, P.A., Delprato, D.J. Classical Conditioning of “Hypnotic” Arm Movement. Psychol Rec 28, 305–313 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394540

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394540

Navigation