Skip to main content
Log in

Repeated Acquisition of Response Sequences by Pigeons Under Chained and Tandem Schedules with Reset and Non-Reset Contingencies

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to acquire a new four-response sequence in each session by pecking three keys in a predetermined order. The keys were illuminated by different colors during each step under the chained schedule, but by only one color under the tandem schedule. Under the reset contingency, incorrect responses produced a short timeout and a reset of the four-response sequence to its beginning. Only the timeout was produced by incorrect responses in the non-reset contingency. Under both chained and tandem schedules, the pigeons responding under the reset contingency made fewer errors during the session and had a more rapid within-session error reduction than the pigeons responding under the non-reset contingency. Under both reset and non-reset contingencies, the pigeons made fewer errors under the chained schedules than under the tandem schedules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BOREN, J. J. 1963. Repeated acquisition of new behavioral chains. American Psychologist, 17, 421 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOREN, J. J., & DEVINE, D. D. 1968. The repeated acquisition of behavioral chains. Journal of the Experimental A nalysis of Behavior, 11, 651–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FERSTER, C. B. 1960. Intermittent reinforcement of matching to sample in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 3, 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. 1957. Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FRY, W., KELLEHER, R. T., & COOK, L. 1960. A mathematical index of performance on fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 3, 193–199.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • NEVIN, J. A., CUMMING, W. W., & BERRYMAN, R. 1963. Ratio reinforcement of matching behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 149–154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & ROSENBERGER, P. B. 1967. Several methods for teaching serial position sequences to monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 467–478.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, D. M. 1973. Repeated acquisition as a behavioral baseline for studying drug effects. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 184, 506–514.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, D. M. 1974. Repeated acquisition of response sequences: Effects of d-amphetamine and chlorpromazine. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 2, 741–746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, D. M. 1975. Repeated acquisition of response sequences: Stimulus control and drugs. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 23, 429–436.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by Grant No. DA00570-02 from the NIDA and by a grant from E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harting, J., McMillan, D.E. Repeated Acquisition of Response Sequences by Pigeons Under Chained and Tandem Schedules with Reset and Non-Reset Contingencies. Psychol Rec 26, 361–367 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394399

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394399

Navigation