Skip to main content
Log in

Schematic Concept Formation as A Measure of Cognitive Aptitude

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study examined the performance in a Schematic Concept Formation task in a sample of 53 Anglo, sixth-grade children and related that performance to measures of intellectual ability. The task was of a 3-choice oddity problem with increasing levels of difficulty. Accuracy increased across trials within the first two levels of difficulty but decreased within the third level of difficulty. The effect of using I.Q. to classify performance across trials was present but not strong. A subset of the verbal descriptors was found to be more related to performance on the Schematic Concept Formation task than to the measures of intellectual ability. Implications of the results relevant to cognitive attitude are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AIKEN, L., & BROWN, R. B. 1971. A feature utilization analysis of the perception of pattern class structure. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 279–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AIKEN, L. S., & WILLIAMS, T. M. 1973. Developmental aspects of schematic concept formation: The acquisition of class concepts in a non-verbal context. Developmental Psychology, 8, 162–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ATTNEAVE, F. 1957. Transfer of experience with a class-schema to identification-learning of patterns and shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 81–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BERSTED, C. T., BROWN, B. R., & EVANS, S. H. 1969. Presorting with stimuli clustered in a multidimensional attribute space. Perception and Psychophysics, 6, 409–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, B.R., & EVANS, S. H. 1969. Perceptual learning in pattern discrimination tasks with two and three schema categories. Psychonomic Science, 15, 101–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDMONDS, E. M., & EVANS, S. H. 1966. Schema learning without a prototype. Psychonomic Science, 5, 247–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDMONDS, E. M., & EVANS, S. H., & MUELLER, M. R. 1966. Learning how to learn schemata. Psychonomic Science, 6, 177–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDMONDS, E. M., & MUELLER, M. R. 1967. The role of schemata in perceptual learning. Psychonomic Science, 8, 239–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EVANS, S. H. 1964. A model for perceptual category formation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Christian University.

    Google Scholar 

  • EVANS, S. H. 1967. A brief statement of schema theory. Psychonomic Science, 8, 87–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EVANS, S. H. 1973. Preliminary studies on a test of pattern learning f or aptitude assessment with disadvantaged students. Texas Christian University, Project No. 1F053, Contract No. Oec-6-71-05324509), U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • EVANS, S. H., & ARNOLT, M. D. 1967. Schematic concept formation: Demonstration in a free sorting task. Psychonomic Science, 9, 221–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GLASER, R. 1972. Individuals and learning: the new aptitudes. Educational Researcher, 1 (6), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JONES, E. E., & HOLLEY, J. R. 1970. Schema utilization in pattern perception. Psychonomic Science, 18, 197–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LANE, S. H., & EVANS, S. H. 1972. Some aspects of individual differences in schematic concept formation. U.S. Army, Human Engineering Laboratories Technical Memorandum, (9–72).

    Google Scholar 

  • LINDQUIST, E. F., & FELDT, L. S. 1970. Iowa Tests of Educational Development. Iowa City: University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • NELSON, M. J., LEMKE, T. A., & KELSO, P. C. 1961. Henmon-Nelson Test of Mental Ability, Form A, Iowa. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • OLDFIELD, R. C. 1954. Memory mechanisms and the theory of schemata. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRICE, J. T., & EVANS, S. H. 1972. Schematic concept formation as a predictor of success in a remedial education program. In S. H. Evans (Chm.), Individual difference variables and schematic concept formation: Explorations. Symposium presented at the Southwestern Psychological Association, Oklahoma City.

    Google Scholar 

  • RANKIN, W. D., & EVANS, S. H. 1968. Facilitation of schematic concept formation as a function of two within-schema pretraining models. Psychonomic Science, 13, 325–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RANKIN, W. D., MARKLEY, R. P., & EVANS, S. H. 1970. Pythagorean distance and the judged similarity of schematic stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 7, 103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROHWER, W. D., Jr. 1970a. Images and pictures in children’s learning. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROHWER, W. D., Jr. 1970b. Mental elaboration and proficient learning. In J. P. Hill (Ed.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROHWER, W. D., Jr. 1971. Learning, race and school success. Review of Educational Research, 41, 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROSNER, J. 1972. The development and validation of an individualized perceptual skills curriculum. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIELDS, R. V., GORDON, M. A., & EVANS, S. H. 1969. Schematic concept formation in relationship to mental ability in adolescents. Psychonomic Science, 17, 361–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WOODWORTH, R.S. 1938. Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Appreciation is extended to Dr. S. H. Evans, Dr. R. M. Fenker, and Dr. D. F. Dansereau of the Institute for the Study of Cognitive Systems for their helpful assistance in the Study and to Lucy Hagenbuch, Linda Dus, and Judy Barker for their assistance in data collection and analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lane, S.H. Schematic Concept Formation as A Measure of Cognitive Aptitude. Psychol Rec 25, 525–533 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394344

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394344

Navigation