Skip to main content
Log in

Some Attempts to Demonstrate Exploratory Behavior in Chickens

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both 14-and 55-day-old chickens were provided with a choice between novel and familiar environments under grouped test conditions. Despite manipulations of habituation periods, food deprivation, and contrast between the two test settings, no preference for novelty was observed. A mild preference for familiarity was shown by chickens habituated to the familiar side for 90 min., but this disappeared after 22 h. habituation. In all conditions a strong preference was exhibited for the environment in which the test period began. General methodological problems in measuring “exploratory” responses in this species are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANDERSON, E. E. 1938. The interrelationships of drives in the male albino rat III: Interrelationships among measures of emotional, sexual and exploratory behavior. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 53, 335–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARCHER, J. 1973a. Influence of testosterone on chick behavior in novel environments. Behavioral Biology, 8, 93–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ARCHER, J. 1973b. Tests for emotionality in rats and mice: A review. Animal Behaviour, 21, 205–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CANDLAND, D. K., & NAGY, Z. M. 1969. The open field: Some comparative data. Annals of New York Academy of Science, 159, 831–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEMBER, W. N., & FOWLER, H. 1958. Spontaneous alternation behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 412–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DUTCH, J. 1969. Visual complexity and stimulus pacing in chicks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 63–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EGGER, G. J., LIVESEY, P. J., & DAWSON, R. G. 1973. Ontogenetic aspects of central cholinergic involvement in spontaneous alternation behavior. Developmental Psy- chobiology, 6, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FURCHTGOTT, E., & CURETON, E. 1964. Factor analysis of emotionality and conditioning in mice. Psychological Reports, 15, 787–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HARLESS, M. D., & COLLINS, T. B. 1971. Open field behavior in isolate and trio chicks of two age groups. Psychological Reports, 29, 787–790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, W.N., & WARREN, J. M. 1963. Failure to find spontaneous alternation in chicks. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 575–577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HOGAN, J. A., & ABEL, C. L. 1971. Effects of social factors on response to unfamiliar environments in Gallus Gallus Spadiceus. Animal Behaviour, 19, 687–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HUGHES, R. N. 1965. Food deprivation and locomotor exploration in the white rat. Animal Behaviour, 13, 30–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HUGHES, R.N. 1968a. Effects of food deprivation experience and sex on exploration in rats. British Journal of Psychology, 59, 47–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HUGHES, R. N. 1968b. A re-examination of the effects of age on novelty reactions and exploration in rats. Australian Journal of Psychology, 20, 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HUGHES, R. N. 1969. Exploration in three laboratory rodents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 28, 90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HUGHES, R. N. 1972. Chlordiazepoxide modified exploration in rats. Psychopharmacologia (Berlin), 24, 462–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HUGHES, R. N., & SWANBERG, K. M. Effects of food deprivation on exploration in deprivationally naive rats. Australian Journal of Psychology, 22, 79–84.

  • KIRKBY, R. J. 1967. A maturation factor in spontaneous alternation. Nature (London), 215, 784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAEGERT, S., & RAJECKI, D. W. 1973. Effects of prior exposure to animate objects on approach tendency in chicks. Behavioral Biology, 8, 749–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SALZEN, E. A. 1963. Imprinting and the immobility reaction of domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour, 11, 66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIMMEL, E. C. 1962. Social facilitation of exploratory behavior in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 831–833.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SIMMEL, E. C., & WALKER, D. A. 1972. The effects of a companion on exploratory behavior in two strains of inbred laboratory mice. Behavior Genetics, 2, 249–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

These data were collected while the first author held a N.Z.U.G.C. postdoctoral Fellowship at the Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Syme, G.J., Syme, L.A. Some Attempts to Demonstrate Exploratory Behavior in Chickens. Psychol Rec 25, 363–371 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394328

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394328

Navigation