Skip to main content
Log in

Imprinting in Quail as a Function of Pre- and Postnatal Auditory Stimulation

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three prenatal exposure conditions and 3 posthatch imprinting conditions (no sound Jay calls, and quail calls) were evaluated for their effect on following in Japanese quail chicks. The presence of prenatal sound had a significant effect on imprinting; birds exposed to jay and quail sounds prenatally followed significantly more than those exposed to no sound. Quail demonstrated no significant innate preference for the female call of the species. Auditory stimulation coupled with visual stimulation generates more following and imprinting than visual alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • COLLIAS, N. E. 1952. The development of social behavior in birds. Auk, 69. 127–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FABRICIUS, E. 1951a. Zur Ethologie Junger Anatiden. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 68, 1–175, cited by Sluckin, W. 1965. Imprinting and Early Learning. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • FABRICIUS, E. 1951b. Some experiments on imprinting phenomena in ducks. Proc X International Ornithological Congress, 375–379, cited by Sluckin, W. 1965. Imprinting and Early Learning, Chicago: Aldine. P. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • FANCHER, D. 1971. The effects of prenatal auditory stimulation on imprinting behavior. Dissertation Abstracts International, 31 (11B), 6928.

    Google Scholar 

  • FISCHER, G. J. 1966. Auditory stimuli in imprinting. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 61(2), 271–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GOTTLIEB, G. 1963. “Imprinting” in nature. Science, 139, 497–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GRIER, J. B. 1967. Prenatal auditory imprinting in chickens. Science, 155, 1692–1693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HESS, E. 1972. “Imprinting” in a natural laboratory. Scientific American, 111, 24-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLOPFER, P. H. 1959a. An analysis of learning in young anatidae. Ecology, 40, 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KLOPFER, P. H. 1959b. The development of sound signal preferences in ducks. Wilson Bulletin, 71, 262–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • LORENZ, K. 1935. Companionship in bird life; fellow members of the species as releasers of social behavior, cited by Schiller, C. H. (Ed.) 1957. Instinctive Behavior, New York: International University Press. Pp. 83–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • PORTER, R., & STETTNER, L. 1968. Visual and auditory influences on following responses of bob white quail. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66(3), 808–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We want to express appreciation for assistance in experimentation to Chris Bailey and Jan Morganthaler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ewing, A.T., Ewing, R.W. & Vanderweele, D.A. Imprinting in Quail as a Function of Pre- and Postnatal Auditory Stimulation. Psychol Rec 25, 333–337 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394324

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394324

Navigation