Skip to main content
Log in

Processing Time and Complexity Preference in Preschool Children

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preschool children were presented with modified jigsaw puzzles containing 1, 3, 6, 10, and 16 pairs of pieces. Half of the Ss were given 30 sec. to complete each puzzle; half were given 2 min. Both groups exhibited an inverted-U relationship between complexity and preference. As predicted, the 2-min. group exhibited maximal preference for a higher complexity level than did the 30-sec. group. The advantages of tasks as opposed to random stimuli in complexity preference research were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARKES, H. R., & BOYKIN, A. W. 1971. Analysis of complexity preference in Head Start and nursery school children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 33, 1131–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ATTNEAVE, F. 1957. Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 221–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BERLYNE, D. 1960. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • BERLYNE, D. E. 1967. Arousal and reinforcement. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOYKIN, A. W. 1972. Verbally expressed preference and complexity judgments as they relate to levels of performance in a problem-solving situation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAY, H. I., & CRAWFORD, G. C. 1971. Developmental changes in attitudes toward complexity. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Minneapolis, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMBER, W., & EARL, W. 1957. Analysis of exploratory, manipulatory, and curiosity behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 91–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KAMMAN, R. 1966. Verbal complexity and preferences in poetry. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 536–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAY, R. 1963. Stimulus selectin in preschool children under conditions of free choice. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 16, 203–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCALL, R. B., & MELSON, W. H. 1970. Complexity, contour and area as determinants of attention in infants. Developmental Psychology, 3, 343–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MUNSINGER, H., & KESSEN, W. 1964. Uncertainty, structure, and preference. Psychological Monographs, 78, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MUNSINGER, H., & KESSEN, W. 1966a. Stimulus variability, and cognitive change. Psychological Review, 73, 164–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MUNSINGER, H., & KESSEN, W. 1966b. Structure, variability, and development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 4, 20–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • STENSON, H. H. 1966. The physical factor structure of random forms and their judged complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 1, 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYLOR, W. L. 1954. Application of “cloze” and entropy measures to the study of contextual constraint in samples of continuous prose. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMAS, H. 1966. Preferences for random shapes: Ages six through nineteen years. Child Development, 37, 843–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • THOMAS, H. 1971. Discrepancy hypothesis: Methodological and theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 78, 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VANDERPLAS, J. M., & GARVIN, E. A. 1959. Complexity, association value, and practice as factors in shape recognition following paired-associates training. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 155–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We wish to thank Mr. Martinez and the staff of the Washtenaw County, Michigan, Head Start Program for their cooperation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boykin, A.W., Arkes, H.R. Processing Time and Complexity Preference in Preschool Children. Psychol Rec 24, 259–265 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394242

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394242

Navigation