Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Low Performance Group and Individual Contingencies on Cooperative Behaviors Exhibited by Fifth Graders

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of group, individual, and 2 contingencies composed of different proportions of individual and group reinforcement on cooperative behaviors were measured employing experimental and comparison children from 3 5th-grade classes. Cooperative behaviors were measured during the 25-min. periods per day in which the children worked at 40 randomly selected arithmetic problems. The four groups of Ss went through the following reinforcement conditions in a counter-balanced randomized order: 100% individual; 67% individual/33% group; 33% individual/67% group; and 100% group. The 100% group contingency consistently produced the highest incidence of cooperative behavior both wdthin and between periods. As the proportion of group reinforcement composing a contingency decreased, the incidence of cooperative behavior decreased. The results of this study suggest that group contingencies may be useful in creating cooperative work patterns in classroom settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AZRIN, N. H., & LINDSLEY, O. R. 1965. The reinforcement of cooperation between children. In L. Krasner & L. P. Ullman (Eds.), Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIRNBRAUER, J. S., BIJOU, S. W., WOLF, M. M., & KIDDER, J. D. 1965. Programmed instruction in the classroom. In L. Krasner & L. P. Ullman (Eds.), Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRUNING, J. L., & KINTZ, B. L. 1968. Computational handbook of statistics. Glen-view, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAMPBELL, D. T., & STANLEY, J. C. 1967. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, D. J. 1962. Justin and his peers: An experimental analysis of a child’s social world. Child Development, 33, 697–717.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HALL, R. V., LUND, D., & JACKSON, D. 1968. Effects of teacher attention on study behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAMBLIN, R. L., BUCKHOLDT, D., FERRITOR, D. E., KOZLOFF, M. A., & BLACKWELL, L. J. 1971. The humanization processes. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • HART, B. M., REYNOLDS, N. J., BAER, D. M., BRAWLEY, E. M., & HARRIS, F. R. 1968. Effect of contingent and non-contingent social reinforcement on the cooperative play of a preschool child. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 73–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HINGTGEN, J. N., SANDERS, B. J., & DEMYER, M. K. 1965. Shaping cooperative responses in early childhood schizophrenics. In L. Krasner & L. P. Ullman (Eds.), Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • HINGTGEN, J. N., & TROST, F. C., JR. 1966. Shaping cooperative responses in early childhood schizophrenics: II. Reinforcement of mutual physical contact and vocal responses. In R. Ulrich, T. Stachnik, & J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behavior. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • LENNES, N. J., & TRAVER, L. R. 1964. The Lennes essentials of arithmetic, 4, 5, & 6. River Forest, Ill.: Laidlaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • LINDSLEY, O. R. 1966. Experimental analysis of cooperation and competition. In T. Verhave (Ed.), The experimental analysis of behavior-selected readings. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • REYNOLDS, N. J., & RISLEY, T. R. 1968. The role of social and material rein-forcers in increasing talking of a disadvantaged preschool child. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(3), 253–262.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • STAATS, A. W., & BUTTERFIELD, W. H. 1965. Treatment of nonreading in a culturally deprived juvenile delinquent: An application of reinforcement principles. Child Development, 36, 925–942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WIKE, E. L. 1971. A statistical primer for psychology students. New York: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • WODARSKI, J. S., HAMBLIN, R. L., BUCKHOLDT, D. R., & FERRITOR, D. E. 1971. Effects of individual and group contingencies on arithmetic performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLF, M. M., GILES, D. K., & HALL, R. V. 1968. Experiments with token reinforcement in a remedial classroom. Behavior Research and Therapy, 6, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Portions of this manuscript were presented at the Fifth Annual Meeting, The Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy; Washington, D. C, September, 1971.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wodarski, J.S., Hamblin, R.L., Buckholdt, D.R. et al. The Effects of Low Performance Group and Individual Contingencies on Cooperative Behaviors Exhibited by Fifth Graders. Psychol Rec 22, 359–368 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394100

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394100

Navigation