Abstract
3 pigeons were exposed to a chain FI 2 adjusting ratio schedule with a switching option. The adjusting ratio was equal to the number of responses in the interval. When Ss were given the option to switch from the adjusting ratio to a fixed ratio, an interaction was demonstrated between the number of responses in the interval and the size of the fixed ratio.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BERRYMAN, R., & NEVIN, J. A. 1962. Interlocking schedules of reinforcement Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 213–223.
BLOUGH, D. S. 1958. A method for obtaining psychophysical thresholds in the pigeon Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 31–43.
DUNCAN, B., & FANTINO, E. 1970. Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 73–86.
FANTINO, E. 1967. Preference for mixed-versus fixed-ratio schedules Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 35–42.
FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. 1957. Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
FINDLEY, J. P. 1958. Preference and switching under concurrent scheduling Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 123–144.
HERRNSTEIN, R. J. 1964. Aperiodicity as a factor in choice Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 179–182.
KELLEHER, R. T., FRY, W., & COOK, L. 1964. Adjusting fixed-ratio schedules in the squirrel monkey Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 69–77.
KILLEEN, P. 1970. Preference for fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 127–131.
MILLENSON, J. K. 1966. Probability of response and probability of reinforcement in a response defined analog of an interval schedule Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 87–94.
RANDOLPH, J. J., & SEWELL, W. R. 1968. A chained adjusting ratio schedule Psychological Reports, 22, 989–995.
SEGAL, E. F., 1965. First attempt at a positive conditioned reinforcement analog of discriminated avoidance Psychonomic Science, 2, 199–200.
SHERMAN, J. A., & THOMAS, J. R. 1968. Some factors controlling preference between fixed-ratio and variable-ratio schedules of reinforcement Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 689–702.
STEIN, L. 1962. An analysis of stimulus duration preference in self-stimulation of the brain Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 405–514.
WEISS, B., & LATIES, V. G. 1959. Titration behavior on various fractional escape program Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2, 227–248.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant NS6-45, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, to the Institute for Behavioral Research, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Randolph, J.J. A Switching Analysis of Behavior Controlled by an Adjusting Ratio Schedule. Psychol Rec 22, 259–265 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394090
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394090