Skip to main content
Log in

Acquisition and Extinction of the Conditioned Avoidance Response: a Comparison Between Male Rats and Estrus and Non-Estrus Female Rats

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male hooded rats were compared with non-estrus females in acquisition and extinction of an avoidance response. No differential extinction rates were found between these groups although terminal performance differences were present in acquisition. Females, which during acquisition were not in estrus, were divided into estrus and non-estrus groups in extinction. No differences were significant during early trials, but both performance and rate changes were noted thereafter, the non-estrus Ss being superior to estrus Ss on both measures. Results are discussed in terms of the influence of the estrus variable on male-female comparative studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AREY, L. B. 1965. Developmental anatomy. Philadelphia: W. B. Sanders.

    Google Scholar 

  • COREY, S. M. 1930. Sex differences in maze learning by white rats Journal of Comparative Psychology, 10, 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DENENBERG, V. H., & MORTON, J. R. C. 1964. Infantile stimulation, prepubertal sexual-social interaction, and emotionality Animal Behavior, 12, 11–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FINGER, F. W. 1969. Estrus and general activity in the rat Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 68, 461–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HUGHES, R. N. 1968. Behavior of male and female rats with free ’choice of two environments differing in novelty Animal Behavior, 16, 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAYYASI, A. M., & TERRY, R. A. 1969. Effects of direct electric fields, noise, sex and age on maze learning in rats International Journal of Biometeorology, 13, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RICHTER, C. P. 1922. A behavioristic study of the activity in rats Comparative Psychological Monographs, 1, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, C. N., & BROOKSHIRE, K. H. 1967. Shuttle box avoidance learning and epinephrine Psychonomic Science, 9, 419–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TERRY, R. A., HARDEN, D. G., & MAYYASI, A. M. 1969. Effects of negative air ions, noise, sex and age on maze learning in rats International Journal of Biometeorology, 13, 39–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • TOMILIN, M. I., & STONE, C. P. 1933. Sex difference in learning abilities of albino rats Journal of Comparative Psychology, 16, 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VALLE, F. P. 1970. Effects of strain, sex, and illumination on open-field behavior of rats The American Journal of Psychology, 83, 103–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WANG, G. H. 1923. The relation between “spontaneous” activity and oestrus cycle in the white rat Comparative Psychological Monographs, 2, 264–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Portions of this research were supported by a universitv faculty grant made to R. C. Trost.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ikard, W.L., Bennett, W.C., Lundin, R.W. et al. Acquisition and Extinction of the Conditioned Avoidance Response: a Comparison Between Male Rats and Estrus and Non-Estrus Female Rats. Psychol Rec 22, 249–254 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394088

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394088

Navigation