Abstract
A pigeon that injured its beak pecking a response key subsequently exhibited an aversion to continuous key pecking even though near 70% of free feeding weight and its beak was healed. When placed in the chamber, it would peck the key once but would not respond again for sessions of 1½ hours. Key pecking was then shaped using a procedure consisting of removing the bird after one reinforced key peck. This operation was continued for 7 “in/out” trials. On the 8th trial the bird continued responding with an interresponse time of less than 30 sec. The schedule was then faded to a terminal value. The results suggest that stimuli associated with the beginning of the session controlled the initial key peck, whereas those occurring during the session were paired with injury and inhibited continuous responding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. 1957. Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
KELLEHER, R. T., RIDDLE, W. C., & COOK, L. 1962. Observing responses in pigeons Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 3–13.
LEVI, W. M. 1957. The pigeon (Rev. ed.) Sumter, S. C: Levi Publishing Co.
MAGEE, K. R., SCHNEIDER, S. F., & ROSENZWEIG, N. 1961. Congenital indifference to pain Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 132, 249–259.
REYNOLDS, G. S. 1968. A primer of operant conditioning. Glenview, III.: Scott, Foresman.
SKINNER, B. F. 1956. A case history in scientific method American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.
WYCKOFF, L. B. Jr. 1952. The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Part I Psychological Review, 59, 431–442.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author wishes to thank colleagues for critical comments on this report.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Auge, R.J. Differential Control of Responding Following Beak Injury. Psychol Rec 22, 217–220 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394082
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394082