Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 17–36 | Cite as

Applications of Communication Theory I. The Substructure of Science

  • William Stephenson
Article

Abstract

The concern is with the nature of science. What is proposed is that subjective aspects of science have been seriously underestimated in the past and that it requires our communication theory concept of communication-pleasure for its understanding. Scientific thinking, it is proposed, is basically conversational—matters of opinion more than of fact. Methods are proposed for bringing this subjective substructure under a measure of objective control. A profound methodological axiom is asserted which is all that distinguishes objectivity from subjectivity.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BAR-HILLEL, Y. 1955. An examination of information theory. Philosophy of Science., 22, 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BECKER, C. 1965. Progress and power. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  3. BRONOWSKI, J. 1956. Science and human value. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. BROUWER, M. 1967. Prolegomena to a theory of mass communication. In L. Thayer (Ed.), Communication: Concepts and perspective. Washington, D.C.: Spartan.Google Scholar
  5. BURT, C. 1940. The factors of the mind. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
  6. BUSH, V. L. 1946. Endless horizon. Washington, D, C: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
  7. CHARGAFF, E. 1971. Preface to a grammar of biology. Science., 172, 637–642.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. DUNNETTE, M. D. 1966. Fads, fashions and folderol in psychology. American Psychologist., 21, 343–351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. EDDINGTON, A. 1939. The philosophy of physical Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  10. GARVEY, W. D. & GRIFFITH, B. D. 1964. The structure, objectives, and findings of a study of scientific information exchange in psychology. American Documentation., 15, 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. GLASS, B. 1968. Pugwash interest in communications. Science., 159, 1328–1331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. GLASS, B. 1970. The timely and the timeles. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. GLASS, B. 1971. Science: Endless horizons or golden age. Science., 171, 23–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. HAGSTROM, W. O. 1965. The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. HEISENBERG, W. 1971. Physics and beyond: Encounters and conversation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  16. HUIZINGA, J. 1950. Homo luden. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  17. KOFFKA, K. 1935. Principles of gestalt psychology. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
  18. KUHN, T. S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. MACK AY, D. M. 1950. Quantal aspects of scientific information. Philosophy Magazine., 41, 289.Google Scholar
  20. MACKAY, D. M. 1969. Information, mechanism and meanin. Cambridge: Mit Press.Google Scholar
  21. MASLOW, A. H. 1966. The psychology of Science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  22. MASLOW, A. H. 1962. Toward a psychology of being. New York: VanNostrand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MASLOW, A. H. 1964. Religions, values and peak-experience. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  24. MERTON, R. K. 1957. Priorities in scientific discovery. American Sociological Review., 22, 635–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MEYER, L. B. 1967. Music, the arts and idea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. NEEDHAM, J. 1964. Science and society in east and west. In M. Goldsmith & A. MacKay (Eds.), Society and Science. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  27. NORTHROP, F. C. A. 1947. The logic of the sciences and the humanities. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. OVERHAGE, C. F. J. 1968. Science libraries: Prospects and problems. Science., 155, 802–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. PAISLEY, W. J. 1965. The flow of (behavioral) science information: A review of the research literature. (A report of the Institute for Communication Research, Stanford University.)Google Scholar
  30. PATTERSON, J. 1966. Attitudes about science: A dissection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri.Google Scholar
  31. POLANYI, M. 1964. Science, faith and societ. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. POPPER, K. R. 1962. Conjectures and refutation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. PRICE, D. J. de S. 1963. Little science, big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  34. PRICE, D. J. de S. 1964. The science of science. In M. Goldsmith & A. MacKay (Eds.), Society and Science. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  35. PRICE, D. L. de S. 1961. Science since Babylon. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. RYLE, G. 1950. The concept of mind. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. SANTILLANO, G. de. 1955. The crime of Galileo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. SARTRE, J. P. 1957. Existentialism and human existence. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  39. SCOTT, C. 1959. The use of technical literature by industrial technologists. (National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council—Proceedings of the International Converence on Scientific Information) 245-266.Google Scholar
  40. SEIDENBERG, R. 1950. Post-historic man. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  41. SEIDENBERG, R. 1961. Anatomy of the future. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  42. SHAPERE, D. 1971. The paradigm concept. Science., 172, 706–709.Google Scholar
  43. SHILLING, C. W., BERNARD, J., & TYSON, J. W. 1964. Informal communication among biochemis. (Biological Sciences Communication Project, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.).Google Scholar
  44. SNOW, C. P. 1959. The two cultures and the scientific revolution. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. STENT, G. S. 1969. The coming of the golden age. Garden City: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
  46. STEPHENSON, W. 1953. The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. STEPHENSON, W. 1961. Scientific creed. Psychological Record., 11, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. STEPHENSON, W. 1967. The play theory of mass communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. STEPHENSON, W. 1968. Perspectives in psychology: XXVI, Consciousness Out-subjectivity in. Psychological Record., 18, 499–501.Google Scholar
  50. STEPHENSON, W. 1969. Foundations of communication theory. Psychological Record., 19, 65–82.Google Scholar
  51. SZASZ, T. S. 1957. Pain and pleasure. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  52. TANNENBAUM, P. H. 1963. Communication of science information. Science., 140, 579–583.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. THISTLE, M. W. 1958. Popularizing science. Science., 135, 951–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vannostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia. 1958. Princeton: D. VanNostrand Co.Google Scholar
  55. VICKERS, G. 1967. The multi-valued choice. In L. Thayer (Ed.), Communication: Concepts and perspective. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. WATSON, J. D. 1968. The double heli. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  57. WHITEHEAD, A. N. 1948. Science and the modern worl. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. WOLFENSTEIN, M., & LEITES, N. 1950. Movies: A psychological stud. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. XHIGNESSE, L. V., & OSGOOD, C E. 1963. Bibliographic citation characteristics of the psychological network in 1950 and 1960. Urbana: University of Illinois, Institute of Communications Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Stephenson
    • 1
  1. 1.Walter Williams HallUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations