Skip to main content
Log in

Acquisition and Extinction of an Instrumental Response as a Function of Quality and Quantity of Reinforcement

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The experiment used 63 albino rats trained in controlled-operant bar-pressing boxes. The design was a 3 × 3 factorial in which 3 levels of sucrose concentration (4%, 16%, and 64%) were combined with 3 levels of volume (.05, .15, and .45 ml.). The major findings were (a) acquisition performance was an increasing monotonic function of both volume and concentration, (b) volume and concentration interacted with the effects of volume being greatest at low level of concentration, and (c) in extinction only concentration affected performance, with the 4% groups showing poorer performance in early trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AMSEL, A. 1958. The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situation. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 102–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BLACK, R. W. 1965. Discrimination learning as a function of varying pairs of sucrose rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 452–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COLLIER, G. 1959. The loci of reinforcement. American Psychologist, 14, 398.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLLIER, G., KNARR, F. A., & MARX, M. H. 1961. Some relations between the intensive properties of the consummatory response and reinforcement. Jour-nal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 484–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COLLIER, G., & MYERS, L. 1961. The loci of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 57–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COLLIER, G., & SISKEL, M., Jr. 1959. Performance as a joint function of amount of reinforcement and interreinforcement interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 115–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COLLIER, G., VOGEL, J., & REGA, F. 1966. Two-bar sucrose preference. Psychonomie Science, 6, 203–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COLLIER, G., & WILLIS, F. N. 1961. Deprivation and reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 377–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GUTTMAN, N. 1953. Operant conditioning, extinction, and periodic reinforcement in relation to concentration of sucrose used as a reinforcing agent. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 213–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GUTTMAN, N. 1954. Equal-reinforcement values for sucrose and glucose solutions compared with equal-sweetness values. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 358–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HUTT, F. J. 1954. Rate of barpress as a function of quality and quantity of food reward. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 235–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ISON, J. R., & ROSEN, A. J. 1968. Extinction and reacquisition performance as a function of sucrose-solution rewards and numbers of acquisition trials. Psychological Reports, 22, 375–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KNARR, F. A., & COLLIER, G. 1962. Taste and consummatory activity in amount and gradient of reinforcement functions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 579–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MARX, M. H., & PIEPER, W. A. 1962. Acquisition of instrumental response as a function of incentive contrast. Psychological Reports, 10, 635–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MARX, M. H., & PIEPER, W. A. 1963. Instrumental acquisition and performance on fixed-interval reinforcement as a function of incentive contrast. Psychological Reports, 12, 255–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MARX, M. H., TOMBAUGH, J. W., COLE, C, & DOUGHERTY, D. 1963. Persistence of nonreinforced responding as a function of the direction of a prior ordered incentive shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 542–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MARX, M. H., TOMBAUGH, T. N., HATCH, R. S., & TOMBAUGH, J. W. 1965. Controlled operant boxes with discrete-trial programming for multiple experimental use. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 21, 247–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PUBOLS, B. H. 1960. Incentive magnitude, learning, and performance in animals. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 89–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SCHAEFFER, R. W., & HANNA, B. 1966. Effects of quality and quantity of reinforcement upon response rate in acquisition and extinction. Psychological Reports, 18, 819–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPERLING, S. E. 1965. Reversal learning and resistance to extinction: A review of the rat literature. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 281–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • STEBBENS, W. C., MEAD, P. B., & MARTIN, J. M. 1959. The relation of amount of reinforcement to performance under fixed-interval schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2, 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TOMBAUGH, T. N., & MARX, M. H. 1965. Effects of ordered and constant sucrose concentrations on nonreinforced performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 630–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UHL, C. N., & YOUNG, A. G. 1967. Resistance to extinction as a function of incentive, percentage of reinforcement and number of non-reinforced trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 556–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by Grant GB 5853 from the National Science Foundation, Grant HD 00895 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and Research Career Award 1-K6-MH-22,023 from the National Institute of Mental Health, to the first author, and by N.R.C. Grant APA 265 to the second author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marx, M.H., Tombaugh, T.N. Acquisition and Extinction of an Instrumental Response as a Function of Quality and Quantity of Reinforcement. Psychol Rec 20, 297–303 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393945

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393945

Navigation