Skip to main content
Log in

Study Interval, Manipulated Frequency, and Verbal Discrimination Learning

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two hypotheses suggested by a frequency theory of verbal discrimination learning were investigated: (a) than an increase in study time would facilitate acquisition of a verbal discrimination list; and (b) that increasing familiarization with stimulus materials prior to training would retard acquisition rate of a verbal discrimination list. Study intervals of 2 and 4 seconds were factorially combined with verbal discrimination pairs of high and low frequency. Free recall learning was employed to produce frequency differentials among discrimination pairs. No evidence was found to support the hypothesis regarding a possible relationship between study time and verbal discrimination acquisition. A significant effect in speed of acquisition due to differential frequency was obtained, indicating faster learning of low frequency pairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARCHER, E. J. 1960. A reevaluation of the meaningfulness of all possible Cvc trigrams. Psychological Monographs, 74, (10, Whole No. 497).

    Google Scholar 

  • EKSTRAND, R. R., WALLACE, W. P., & UNDERWOOD, R. J. 1966. A frequency theory of discrimination learning. Psychological Review, 73 (6), 566–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • POSTMAN, L. 1963. The effects of language habits on the acquisition and retention of verbal associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RUNQUIST, W. N., & FREEMAN, M. 1960. Roles of association value and syllable familiarization in verbal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 396–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • THORNDIKE, E. L., & LORGE, I. 1944. The teachers word book of 30,000 words. New York: Rureau of publications. Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDERWOOD, R. J., & FREUND, J. S. 1968. Two tests of a theory of verbal discrimination learning. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22 (2), 96–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WINER, B. J. 1962. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This report is based on a dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. The author is indebted to Dr. J. C. Koeppel and Dr. R. H. Kolstoe for their comments and suggestions at all stages of the research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skeen, D.R. Study Interval, Manipulated Frequency, and Verbal Discrimination Learning. Psychol Rec 20, 111–117 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393918

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393918

Navigation