Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Delayed Reward and Delay-Box Confinement Upon Instrumental Performance: A Within-Type Design

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The effects of partial delay of reward in training and partial delay-box confinement in extinction were investigated using a within-type experimental design in both training and extinction.One alley of a Grice discriminator led to immediate reward, while the other alley led to 30-sec. delay on two-thirds of the trials. Half of Ss were extinguished with 30-sec. delay-box confinements on two-thirds of the trials in the former delay alley and no delay in the other alley; half had no delay in either alley. In contrast to the results from between-type experiments, partial delay produced less resistance to extinction and changes in delay from training to extinction had no effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AMSEL, A., RASHOTTE, M. E., & MACKINNON, J. R. 1966. Partial reinforcement effects within subjects and between subjects. Psychological Monographs, 80, No. 20 (whole No. 628).

    Google Scholar 

  • CAPALDI, E. J., & POYNER, H. B. 1965. Nonreward confinement duration: The complement of reward magnitude. Psychonomic Science, 3, 515–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRICE, G. R., & HUNTER, J. J. 1964. Stimulus intensity effects depend upon the type of experimental design. Psychological Review, 71, 247–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RENNER, K. E. 1964. Delay of reinforcement: A historical review. Psychological Bulletin, 61, 341–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • TOMBAUGH, T. N. 1966. Resistance to extinction as a function of the interaction between training and extinction delays. Psychological Reports, 19, 791–798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WIKE, E. L. 1966. Secondary reinforcement: Selected experiments. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • WIKE, E. L., MELLGREN, R. L., & COUR, C. A. 1967. Delayed reward, delay-box confinement, and instrumental performance: A within-type design. Psychological Reports, 21, 857–862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WIKE, E. L., & MCWILLIAMS, J. 1967. The effects of long-term training with delayed reward and delay-box confinement on instrumental performance. Psychonomic Science, 9, 389–390. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WIKE, E. L. & McWILLIAMS, J. 1967. Duration of delay, delay-box confinement, and runway performance. Psychological Reports, 21, 865–870. (b)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WIKE, E. L., MELLGREN, R. L., & WIKE, S. S. 1968. Runway performance as a function of delayed reinforcement and delay-box confinement. Psychological Record, 18, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a grant GB4299 from the National Science Foundation and a grant from the Biomedical Research Fund of The University of Kansas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wike, E.L., Atwood, M.E. The Effects of Delayed Reward and Delay-Box Confinement Upon Instrumental Performance: A Within-Type Design. Psychol Rec 20, 57–62 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393908

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393908

Navigation