Abstract
5 fresh water turtles (Chrysemys) were run in each of 4 groups in a maze containing 3 different length pathways: long (108″), medium (84″), and short (60″). Subjects in Group I had 16 free choice trials. Subjects in Groups II, III, and IV were given 16 forced choice trials to the long, medium, and short pathways respectively, followed by 16 free choice trials.
Contrary to earlier findings (Spigel, 1966), no reliable preferences for any of the pathways were found. The apparent weaknesses of this type of “quasi-comparative” approach were discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CASTEEL, D. B. 1911. The discriminative turtle. Journal of Animal Behavior, 1, 1–28.
DASHIELL, J. F. 1930. Direction orientation in maze running by the white rat. Comparative Psychology Monographs, 7 (2), 72.
KRECHEVSKY, I. 1937. Brain mechanisms and variability: variability where no learning is involved. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23, 139–164.
NOBLE, G. K., & BRESLAN, A. M. 1938. The senses involved in the migration of young fresh water turtles after hatching. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 25, 175–193.
SIEGEL, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw Hill.
SPIGEL, I. M. 1966. Variability in maze-path selection by turtles. Journal of General Psychology, 75, 21–27.
TINKLEPAUGH, O. C. 1932. Maze learning of a turtle. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 13, 201–206.
YERKES, R. M. 1901. Formation of habits in the turtle. Popular Science Monthly, 58, 519–525. 305–311.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hart, R.R., Cogan, D.C. & Williamson, L.L. Maze Path Selection in the Turtle (Chrysemys): A Quasi-Comparative Study. Psychol Rec 19, 301–304 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393852
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393852