Skip to main content
Log in

Problem-Solving Ability as Affected by Mild Stress Versus Minimal or No Stress

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

36 college students were assigned randomly either to take a short analogies test or to observe the test from the next room through a one-way vision mirror. A stooge was employed to get the observer to participate actively. The results indicate that individuals from whom no response was required and, therefore, no pressure or stress was involved, performed significantly better than individuals who were required to take the test, and who were told that the outcome would influence their school grade. This latter situation created at least mild stress and, since the subjects had no idea as to the purpose of the experiment, more closely simulated a true-life situation than previous studies in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BRIM, O. G., Jr., GLASS, D. C., LAVIN, D. E., & GOODMAN, N. 1962. Personality and decision processes. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EASTERBROOK, J. A. 1959. The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FÄRBER, I. E., & SPENCE, K. W. 1956. Effects of anxiety, stress, and task variables on reaction time. Journal of Personality, 25, 1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GENTILE, J. R., & SCHIPPER, L. M. 1966. Personality variables in probability-learning, decision-making, and risk-taking. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 22, 583–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KOGAN, N., & WALLACH, M. A. 1964. Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • KRECH, D., & CRUTCHFIELD, R. S. 1958. Elements of psychology. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAZARUS, R. S. 1964. A laboratory approach to the dynamics of psychological stress. American Psychologist, 19, 400–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LIVERANT, S., & SCODEL, A. 1960. Internal and external control as determinants of decision making under conditions of risk. Psychological Report, 7, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, K. S. & WORCHEL, P. 1956. The effects of need-achievement and self-ideal discrepancy on performance under stress. Journal of Personality, 25, 176–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RAY. W. S. 1965. Mild stress and problem solving. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 227–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SCODEL, A., RATOOSH, P., & MINAS, J. S. 1959. Some personality correlates of decision making under conditions of risk. Behavioral Science, 4, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPENCE, K. W. 1958. A theory of emotionally based drive (D) and its relation to performance in simple learning situations. American Psychologist, 13, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TAYLOR, J. A. 1963. Drive theory and manifest anxiety. In M. T. Mednick and S. A. Mednick (Eds.), Research in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Pp. 205–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • WESCOTT, M. R. 1962. Inference, Guesswork and Creativity: Cooperative research project #684. New York: Vassar College.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tramontana, J., Morris, J.B. Problem-Solving Ability as Affected by Mild Stress Versus Minimal or No Stress. Psychol Rec 19, 295–300 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393851

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393851

Navigation